Restoration Hardware, Inc. et al v. Houzz Inc.

Filing 41

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND CERTAIN PRETRIAL DATES. Fact discovery cutoff is 12/2/16. Opening expert reports due 12/16/16. Rebuttal expert reports due 1/13/17. Expert discovery cutoff is 2/6/17. Dispositive motion deadline is 3/3/17. Last date for hearing on any dispositive motion is 4/7/17. Further status conference is 5/5/17. Pretrial conference remains set for 6/6/17. Trial remains set for 7/10/17. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 09/22/16. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) JTaylor@mofo.com ANNA FERRARI (CA SBN 261579) AFerrari@mofo.com SABRINA A. LARSON (CA SBN 291661) SLarson@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Plaintiffs RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC. and RH US, LLC 8 9 10 11 12 JENNIFER A. GOLINVEAUX JGolinveaux@winston.com DIANA H. LEIDEN DHLeiden@winston.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5840 Telephone: 415.591.1506 Facsimile: 415.591.1400 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant HOUZZ INC. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC. and RH US, LLC, 20 Plaintiffs, 21 v. Case No. 4:16-cv-00455-MMC JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND CERTAIN PRETRIAL DATES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 22 HOUZZ INC., 23 Defendant. 24 Hon. Maxine M. Chesney Complaint Filed: January 26, 2016 Trial Date: July 10, 2017 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND PRETRIAL DATES AND [PROP] ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00455 sf- 3695841 1 Plaintiffs Restoration Hardware, Inc. and RH US, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant 2 Houzz Inc. (“Defendant”) stipulate and respectfully request the Court to extend certain dates in 3 the schedule set by the Court in its Pretrial Preparation Order (Dkt. No. 27). In support of their 4 request, the parties state as follows: 5 6 WHEREAS, the parties appeared before this Court for a scheduling conference on May 6, 2016; 7 WHEREAS, the Court set certain dates for the parties’ pretrial schedule; 8 WHEREAS, the parties have held on-going discussions regarding settlement; 9 WHEREAS, the parties attended a mediation on September 15, 2016 to discuss 10 11 12 settlement; WHEREAS, the parties are continuing to discuss settlement following the mediation, including with a follow-up phone call with the mediator; 13 WHEREAS, the parties are actively engaged in discovery; 14 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend certain pretrial dates to permit the parties to 15 engage in further settlement discussions amongst themselves and, if necessary, to complete fact 16 and expert discovery; and 17 WHEREAS, there have been two previous extensions of time in this matter extending 18 (i) Defendant’s time to answer (Dkt. No. 10) and (ii) the Parties’ deadline by which to complete 19 mediation (Dkt. No. 31), and the stipulated extension does not affect the scheduled trial date, 20 21 Based on the foregoing, the parties stipulate and respectfully request that this Court extend certain pretrial dates as follows: 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Event  Fact discovery cut off  Opening expert report  Rebuttal expert report  Expert discovery cut off  Dispositive motion deadline   Current October 31, 2016 Proposed  December 2, 2016  November 14, 2016 December 16, 2016  December 9, 2016 January 13, 2017  January 9, 2017 February 6, 2017  February 10, 2017 March 3, 2017  JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND PRETRIAL DATES AND [PROP] ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00455 sf- 3695841 1 1 2 3 Last day for dispositive motion hearing (35 days after dispositive motion deadline) March 17, 2017 April 7, 2017  April 28, 2017 June 6, 2017 July 10, 2017 May 5, 2017  June 6, 2017  July 10, 2017    4 5 CMC  Pretrial Conference Trial   6 7 8 Dated: September 20, 2016 9 10 JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR ANNA FERRARI SABRINA A. LARSON MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 11 By: s/ Jennifer Lee Taylor JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC. and RH US, LLC 14 15 16 Dated: September 20, 2016 JENNIFER A. GOLINVEAUX WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 17 18 19 20 By: s/ Jennifer A. Golinveaux JENNIFER A. GOLINVEAUX Attorneys for Defendant HOUZZ INC. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND PRETRIAL DATES AND [PROP] ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00455 sf- 3695841 2 1 ATTESTATION 2 I, Jennifer Lee Taylor, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. In compliance with Civil Local 4 Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Jennifer A. Golinveaux has concurred in this filing. 5 6 7 Dated: September 20, 2016 JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR ANNA FERRARI SABRINA A. LARSON MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 8 9 10 11 12 By: s/ Jennifer Lee Taylor JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR Attorneys for Plaintiffs RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC. and RH US, LLC 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND PRETRIAL DATES AND [PROP] ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00455 sf- 3695841 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DATES certain pretrial ^ The Parties’ stipulated request to extend the following deadlines is hereby GRANTED: , ^ and the following dates shall apply: ^ Event Fact discovery cut off Opening expert report Rebuttal expert report Expert discovery cut off Dispositive motion deadline Last day for dispositive motion hearing (35 days after dispositive motion deadline) New Date  December 2, 2016  December 16, 2016  January 13, 2017  February 6, 2017  March 3, 2017 April 7, 2017   CMC Further Status Conference May 5, 2017 Pretrial Conference June 6, 2017 Trial   July 10, 2017 (meet and confer by May 1, 2017) 13 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. September 22, 2016 Dated:____________________ ______________________________ Hon. Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND PRETRIAL DATES AND [PROP] ORDER CASE NO. 4:16-CV-00455 sf- 3695841 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?