Restoration Hardware, Inc. et al v. Houzz Inc.

Filing 45

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, it is ordered that plaintiffs' claims alleged against defendant herein be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that i f any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereof on the opposing party, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate. Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 11/30/16. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2016)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC., ET
AL.,

8

Plaintiffs,

9
10

v.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 44

HOUZZ INC.,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 16-cv-00455-MMC

Defendant.

12
The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this

13
14
15

case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ claims alleged against defendant herein

16

be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to

17

this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service of a copy thereof on the opposing

18

party, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the

19

foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the

20

calendar for further proceedings as appropriate.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 30, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge