Stavedahl v. Life Insurance Company of North America

Filing 18

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR, STIPULATION AND ORDER re 13 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Life Insurance Company of North America. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/15/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2016)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EMC

HOWARD STAVEDAHL
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
LIFE INS. COMPANY OF
,
NORTH AMERICA
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/

CASE NO. ______________________
4:16-CV-00475- DMR
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Mediation with
✔
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
Doug DeVries
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
✔
9

August 15, 2016
other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________
04/12/16

____________________________
/s/ Steven Kaiser
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________
04/12/16

____________________________
/s/ Anna M. Martin
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

__________________________________

R NIA

UNIT
ED

Dated: 4/15/16

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

9x
9

A

H

ER

LI

RT

FO

NO

MAGISTRATEhen
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
.C
dward M
Judge E

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2