Pham v. Cathay Pacific Airways Limited et al

Filing 24

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 5/16/2016.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/2/2016. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NHAN VAN PHAM, Plaintiff, 8 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 9 10 Case No. 16-cv-00487-EMC CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LIMITED, et al., For the Northern District of California United States District Court Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Nhan Van Pham has filed suit against Defendants Cathay Pacific Airways Limited 13 14 (“Cathay”) and Alinah Binte Jaffar (apparently, erroneously sued as Diamond Jaffas), asserting 15 claims for defamation, unlawful confinement/false arrest, and negligence. After the case was 16 removed from state to federal court, Ms. Jaffar filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal 17 jurisdiction and Cathay filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Mr. Pham’s oppositions to 18 the motions were due on April 29, 2016. No oppositions were filed on that day. Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the May 26, 2016, hearing on Defendants’ 19 20 motions. Mr. Pham is hereby ordered to show cause as to why his complaint should not be 21 dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to oppose and/or failure to prosecute. Mr. Pham shall also 22 address, in his response to this order to show cause, the substantive arguments raised by 23 Defendants in their respective motions. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Mr. Pham’s response shall be filed within two weeks of the date of this order. Mr. 2 Pham is forewarned that a failure to timely file a response to this order to show cause shall result 3 in a dismissal of this case with prejudice. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 9 10 Dated: May 2, 2016 ______________________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 12 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?