Pham v. Cathay Pacific Airways Limited et al
Filing
24
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 5/16/2016.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/2/2016. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
NHAN VAN PHAM,
Plaintiff,
8
11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
9
10
Case No. 16-cv-00487-EMC
CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LIMITED,
et al.,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
Defendants.
12
Plaintiff Nhan Van Pham has filed suit against Defendants Cathay Pacific Airways Limited
13
14
(“Cathay”) and Alinah Binte Jaffar (apparently, erroneously sued as Diamond Jaffas), asserting
15
claims for defamation, unlawful confinement/false arrest, and negligence. After the case was
16
removed from state to federal court, Ms. Jaffar filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal
17
jurisdiction and Cathay filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Mr. Pham’s oppositions to
18
the motions were due on April 29, 2016. No oppositions were filed on that day.
Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the May 26, 2016, hearing on Defendants’
19
20
motions. Mr. Pham is hereby ordered to show cause as to why his complaint should not be
21
dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to oppose and/or failure to prosecute. Mr. Pham shall also
22
address, in his response to this order to show cause, the substantive arguments raised by
23
Defendants in their respective motions.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Mr. Pham’s response shall be filed within two weeks of the date of this order. Mr.
2
Pham is forewarned that a failure to timely file a response to this order to show cause shall result
3
in a dismissal of this case with prejudice.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
9
10
Dated: May 2, 2016
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
12
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?