Wagda v. Town of Danville et al

Filing 116

ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. Defendants shall file their Supplemental Brief within two days of this Order. Plaintiff shall have leave to file a brief no more than two pages in length in opposition to the Supplemental Brief within seven days of the filing of the Supplemental Brief. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 1/27/17. (mmcalc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

SHARON L. ANDERSON (SBN 94814)
County Counsel
D. CAMERON BAKER (SBN 154432)
Deputy County Counsel
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
651 Pine Street, Ninth Floor
Martinez, California 94553
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Electronic Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
TOWN OF DANVILLE, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,
DAVID LIVINGSTON, STEVE SIMKINS,
MIKE JIMENEZ, EMILY NEABEACK,
TOM ROSSBERG, and STEVEN STAPLETON

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15

DONALD CLOYCE WAGDA,

16
17

Plaintiff,
v.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

TOWN OF DANVILLE; COUNTY OF
CONTRA COSTA; DAVID O.
LIVINGSTON; STEVE SIMPKINS; MIKE
JIMENEZ; EMILY NEABEACK;
THOMAS ROSSBERG; STEVE
STAPLETON; EDMUND G. BROWN JR.,;
KAMALA D. HARRIS; and DOES 1-200,
jointly and severally,
Defendants.

No. C16-0488 MMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION OF
DEFENDANTS FOR LEAVE TO FILE
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT
OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE
PLEADINGS

Date: January 27, 2017
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Crtrm: 7, 19th Floor
Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney, Presiding
Date Action Filed: January 28, 2016
Trial Date: None Assigned

25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS FOR LEAVE TO FILE
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS - Case No.
C16-0488 MMC

1

The Court finds that there is good cause to grant leave to defendants Town of Danville,

1
2

County of Contra Costa, Mike Jimenez, Emily Neabeack, Tom Rossberg, and Steven

3

Stapleton to submit their Supplemental Brief respecting a recent California appellate decision,

4

Espinoza v. Shiomoto, 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 22 (January 12, 2017). Defendants shall file

5

their Supplemental Brief in the form previously submitted within two (2) days of this Order.

6

Plaintiff shall have leave to file a brief no more than two (2) pages in length in opposition to

7

the Supplemental Brief to be filed within seven (7) days of the filing of the Supplemental

8

Brief.

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12
13

DATED: January 27, 2017
______________

______________________________
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Court Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS FOR LEAVE TO FILE
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS - Case No.
C16-0488 MMC

2