Wagda v. Town of Danville et al

Filing 126

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES. The initial case management conference shall be set for June 23, 2017, at 10:30 a.m. (mmcalc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SHARON L. ANDERSON (SBN 94814) County Counsel CHRISTOPHER B. WHITMAN (SBN 223636) Deputy County Counsel COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 651 Pine Street, Ninth Floor Martinez, California 94553 Telephone: (925) 335-1800 Facsimile: (925) 335-1866 Email: christopher.whitman@cc.cccounty.us Attorneys for Defendants TOWN OF DANVILLE, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, STEVE SIMPKINS, MIKE JIMENEZ, EMILY NEABEACK, TOM ROSSBERG, and STEVEN STAPLETON 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 DONALD CLOYCE WAGDA, 14 Plaintiff, No. 3:16-cv-00488-MMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES 15 v. 16 TOWN OF DANVILLE; COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA; DAVID O. LIVINGSTON; STEVE SIMPKINS; MIKE JIMENEZ; EMILY NEABEACK; Courtroom 7, 19th Floor THOMAS ROSSBERG; STEVE The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney STAPLETON; and DOES 1-200, jointly and Date Action Filed: January 28, 2016 severally, Trial Date: None Assigned Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Donald Wagda, who is 24 representing himself, and Defendants Town of Danville, County of Contra Costa, David O. 25 Livingston, Steve Simpkins, Mike Jimenez, Emily Neabeack, Tom Rossberg, and Steven 26 Stapleton (“Defendants”), who are represented by Christopher B. Whitman, that: 27 28 WHEREAS, in light of the unsettled status of the pleadings, and the Court’s recent decision to take Defendants’ pending Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings under STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES – Case No. 3:16-cv-00488-MMC 1 1 submission, there is good cause to continue the initial Case Management Conference from 2 May 19, 2017 at 10:30 a.m. to June 23, 2017 at 10:30 a.m., or at another date and time that is 3 convenient for the Court, and to continue the related dates, including the date for the parties to 4 exchange initial disclosures. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 5 6 DATE: May 8, 2017 7 SHARON L. ANDERSON, County Counsel By: 8 9 10 11 /s/ Christopher B. Whitman Christopher B. Whitman Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Defendants TOWN OF DANVILLE, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, STEVE SIMPKINS, MIKE JIMENEZ, EMILY NEABEACK, TOM ROSSBERG, and STEVEN STAPLETON 12 13 DATE: May 8, 2017 DONALD CLOYCE WAGDA By: 14 /s/ Donald Cloyce Wagda_________ Plaintiff 15 16 17 ATTORNEY ATTESTATION 18 I hereby attest that I have authorization from all of the above-named counsel to E-file 19 this statement, and this authority is reflected by the conformed signature (“/s/”) within this E- 20 filed document. 21 DATE: May 8, 2017 22 SHARON L. ANDERSON, County Counsel By: 23 24 /s/ Christopher B. Whitman Christopher B. Whitman Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Defendants 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// /// STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES – Case No. 3:16-cv-00488-MMC 2 ORDER 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that there is good cause to 3 continue the initial Case Management Conference and related dates. The initial Case 4 Management Conference shall be set for June 23, 2017, at 10:30 a.m. All associated dates, 5 including the date for the parties to exchange initial disclosures, are likewise continued. 6 7 8 May 9, 2017 DATE: _____________ _______________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Court Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES – Case No. 3:16-cv-00488-MMC 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?