Wagda v. Town of Danville et al
Filing
126
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES. The initial case management conference shall be set for June 23, 2017, at 10:30 a.m. (mmcalc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
SHARON L. ANDERSON (SBN 94814)
County Counsel
CHRISTOPHER B. WHITMAN (SBN 223636)
Deputy County Counsel
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
651 Pine Street, Ninth Floor
Martinez, California 94553
Telephone: (925) 335-1800
Facsimile: (925) 335-1866
Email: christopher.whitman@cc.cccounty.us
Attorneys for Defendants TOWN OF DANVILLE,
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, DAVID O. LIVINGSTON,
STEVE SIMPKINS, MIKE JIMENEZ, EMILY NEABEACK,
TOM ROSSBERG, and STEVEN STAPLETON
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
DONALD CLOYCE WAGDA,
14
Plaintiff,
No. 3:16-cv-00488-MMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
RELATED DEADLINES
15
v.
16
TOWN OF DANVILLE; COUNTY OF
CONTRA COSTA; DAVID O.
LIVINGSTON; STEVE SIMPKINS; MIKE
JIMENEZ; EMILY NEABEACK;
Courtroom 7, 19th Floor
THOMAS ROSSBERG; STEVE
The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
STAPLETON; and DOES 1-200, jointly and
Date Action Filed: January 28, 2016
severally,
Trial Date: None Assigned
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Donald Wagda, who is
24
representing himself, and Defendants Town of Danville, County of Contra Costa, David O.
25
Livingston, Steve Simpkins, Mike Jimenez, Emily Neabeack, Tom Rossberg, and Steven
26
Stapleton (“Defendants”), who are represented by Christopher B. Whitman, that:
27
28
WHEREAS, in light of the unsettled status of the pleadings, and the Court’s recent
decision to take Defendants’ pending Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings under
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES – Case No. 3:16-cv-00488-MMC
1
1
submission, there is good cause to continue the initial Case Management Conference from
2
May 19, 2017 at 10:30 a.m. to June 23, 2017 at 10:30 a.m., or at another date and time that is
3
convenient for the Court, and to continue the related dates, including the date for the parties to
4
exchange initial disclosures.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5
6
DATE: May 8, 2017
7
SHARON L. ANDERSON, County Counsel
By:
8
9
10
11
/s/ Christopher B. Whitman
Christopher B. Whitman
Deputy County Counsel
Attorneys for Defendants TOWN OF
DANVILLE, COUNTY OF CONTRA
COSTA, DAVID O. LIVINGSTON,
STEVE SIMPKINS, MIKE JIMENEZ,
EMILY NEABEACK, TOM ROSSBERG,
and STEVEN STAPLETON
12
13
DATE: May 8, 2017
DONALD CLOYCE WAGDA
By:
14
/s/ Donald Cloyce Wagda_________
Plaintiff
15
16
17
ATTORNEY ATTESTATION
18
I hereby attest that I have authorization from all of the above-named counsel to E-file
19
this statement, and this authority is reflected by the conformed signature (“/s/”) within this E-
20
filed document.
21
DATE: May 8, 2017
22
SHARON L. ANDERSON, County Counsel
By:
23
24
/s/ Christopher B. Whitman
Christopher B. Whitman
Deputy County Counsel
Attorneys for Defendants
25
26
27
28
///
///
///
///
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES – Case No. 3:16-cv-00488-MMC
2
ORDER
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that there is good cause to
3
continue the initial Case Management Conference and related dates. The initial Case
4
Management Conference shall be set for June 23, 2017, at 10:30 a.m. All associated dates,
5
including the date for the parties to exchange initial disclosures, are likewise continued.
6
7
8
May 9, 2017
DATE: _____________
_______________________________
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Court Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES – Case No. 3:16-cv-00488-MMC
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?