Wagda v. Town of Danville et al
ORDER DEEMING MOTION WITHDRAWN. Plaintiff's motion to strike affirmative defenses is deemed withdrawn. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 28, 2017. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2017)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DONALD CLOYCE WAGDA,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 16-cv-00488-MMC
ORDER DEEMING MOTION
TOWN OF DANVILLE, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 93
On December 22, 2016, plaintiff filed a "Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses,"
and noticed the motion for hearing on February 10, 2017. In the interim, the Court, by
order filed January 3, 2017, approved the parties' stipulation to defer briefing and hearing
on plaintiff's motion pending the Court's resolution of defendants' earlier-filed motion for
judgment on the pleadings, and directed the parties to submit, within seven days of the
issuance of an order resolving defendants' motion, a revised briefing schedule on
Thereafter, on May 26, 2017, the Court issued an order granting in part and
denying in part defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings. To date, however, no
revised briefing schedule on plaintiff's motion to strike has been filed, nor has plaintiff
otherwise indicated an intent to proceed thereon.
Under the circumstances, plaintiff's motion to strike is hereby deemed withdrawn.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 28, 2017
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?