Wagda v. Town of Danville et al

Filing 135

ORDER DEEMING MOTION WITHDRAWN. Plaintiff's motion to strike affirmative defenses is deemed withdrawn. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 28, 2017. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DONALD CLOYCE WAGDA, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 16-cv-00488-MMC ORDER DEEMING MOTION WITHDRAWN v. TOWN OF DANVILLE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 93 Defendants. 12 13 On December 22, 2016, plaintiff filed a "Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses," 14 and noticed the motion for hearing on February 10, 2017. In the interim, the Court, by 15 order filed January 3, 2017, approved the parties' stipulation to defer briefing and hearing 16 on plaintiff's motion pending the Court's resolution of defendants' earlier-filed motion for 17 judgment on the pleadings, and directed the parties to submit, within seven days of the 18 issuance of an order resolving defendants' motion, a revised briefing schedule on 19 plaintiff's motion. 20 Thereafter, on May 26, 2017, the Court issued an order granting in part and 21 denying in part defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings. To date, however, no 22 revised briefing schedule on plaintiff's motion to strike has been filed, nor has plaintiff 23 otherwise indicated an intent to proceed thereon. 24 Under the circumstances, plaintiff's motion to strike is hereby deemed withdrawn. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: September 28, 2017 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?