Wagda v. Town of Danville et al
Filing
87
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR-RELATED DATES. The Court continues the initial Case Management Conference from August 26, 2016, to December 2, 2016. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 7/28/16. (mmcalc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
SHARON L. ANDERSON (SBN 94814)
County Counsel
D. CAMERON BAKER (SBN 154432)
Deputy County Counsel
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
651 Pine Street, Ninth Floor
Martinez, California 94553
Telephone: (925) 335-1800
Facsimile: (925) 335-1866
Electronic Mail: cameron.baker@cc.cccounty.us
Attorneys for Defendants TOWN OF DANVILLE,
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, DAVID O. LIVINGSTON,
STEVE SIMPKINS, MIKE JIMENEZ, EMILY NEABEACK,
TOM ROSSBERG, and STEVEN STAPLETON
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
DONALD CLOYCE WAGDA,
15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
18
No. C16-0488 MMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
ADR-RELATED DATES
TOWN OF DANVILLE, et al.,
Defendants.
19
20
21
Crtrm: 7, 19th Floor
Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney, Presiding
Date Action Filed: January 28, 2016
Trial Date: None Assigned
22
23
The parties to this action, Plaintiff Donald Wagda, who is representing himself,
24
defendants Town of Danville, County of Contra Costa, David O. Livingston, Steve Simpkins,
25
Mike Jimenez, Emily Neabeack, Tom Rossberg, and Steven Stapleton, who are represented by
26
D. Cameron Baker, and defendants Governor Edmund Brown and Attorney General Kamala
27
Harris, who are represented by Raymond Hamilton, hereby stipulate to the following:
28
//
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND ADR RELATED DATES - Case No. C16-0488 EDL
1
1
In light of the unsettled status of the pleadings and the pending motions to dismiss,
2
there is good cause to continue the initial Case Management Conference from August 26,
3
2016, at 10:30 a.m. and to continue the related dates, including the date for the parties to
4
submit stipulation to an ADR process or Notice for ADR Phone Conference.
5
6
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: July 27, 2016
7
SHARON L. ANDERSON
COUNTY COUNSEL
8
By:
/s/ D. Cameron Baker
D. CAMERON BAKER
Deputy County Counsel
Attorneys for Defendants Town of Danville,
County of Contra Costa, David O. Livingston,
Steve Simpkins, Mike Jimenez, Emily Neabeack,
Tom Rossberg, and Steven Stapleton
DATED: July 27, 2016
By:
/s/ Donald Cloyce Wagda_________
DONALD CLOYCE WAGDA
Plaintiff
DATED: July 27, 2016
KAMALA D. HARRIS
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
By:
/s/ Raymond W. Hamilton
RAYMOND W. HAMILTON
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Governor Edmund Brown and
Attorney General Kamala Harris
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND ADR RELATED DATES - Case No. C16-0488 EDL
2
ORDER
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
There is good cause to continue the initial Case Management Conference from August
4
26, 2016, at 10:30 a.m. and to continue the related dates, including the date for the parties to
5
submit a stipulation regarding ADR process or Notice for ADR Phone Conference. The Court
6
continues the initial Case Management Conference to ________________________. The
December 2, 2016
7
parties are to file a joint initial case management conference statement one week prior to that
8
date. All dates associated with the initial Case Management Conference, including the ADR-
9
related dates, are continued accordingly.
10
11
12
July 28, 2016
DATE: _____________
_______________________________
___________________________
_ _
_
_
_
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
MAXINE
A
United States District Court Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND ADR RELATED DATES - Case No. C16-0488 EDL
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?