Fox Factory, Inc. v. SRAM, LLC

Filing 53

ORDER granting 52 STIPULATION to Amend the Case Schedule. Deadline to Amend/Add Parties: 7/21/2017. Close of Fact Discovery: 12/20/2017. Dispositive Motion to be heard by 5/30/2018. Tutorial Hearing set for 9/22/2017 09:00 AM and Claims Construc tion Hearing set for 9/29/2017 09:00 AM. Pretrial Conference set for 8/13/2018 02:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 9/10/2018 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/22/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP ERICK C. HOWARD (Bar #214107) ehoward@sflaw.com One Maritime Plaza, Eighteenth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 421-6500 Facsimile: (415) 421-2922 LEWIS RICE LLC Richard B. Walsh, Jr. rwalsh@lewisrice.com Michael J. Hickey mhickey@lewisrice.com Sarah A. Milunski smilunski@lewisrice.com Michael H. Durbin mdurbin@lewisrice.com 600 Washington Avenue, Suite 2500 St. Louis, MO 63101 Telephone: (314) 444-7600 Facsimile: (314) 241-6056 Robert F. McCauley (Bar #162056) robert.mccauley@finnegan.com Jeffrey D. Smyth (Bar # 280665) jeffrey.smyth@finnegan.com Christopher B. McKinley (Bar #306087) christopher.mckinley@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 849-6600 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 Attorneys for Plaintiff FOX FACTORY, INC. Attorneys for Defendant SRAM, LLC 13 14 15 16 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 FOX FACTORY, INC., 22 Plaintiff, 23 Related Case Nos. 3:16-CV-00506-WHO AND 3:16-CV-03716-WHO v. 24 SRAM, LLC, 25 Defendant. JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE; ORDER 26 27 28 Case Nos. 3:16-CV-03716-WHO & 3:16-CV-00506-WHO JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER 1 To accommodate the schedule of SRAM’s counsel, Plaintiff FOX Factory, Inc. (“FOX 2 Factory”) and Defendant SRAM, LLC (“SRAM”) respectfully stipulate, with the Court’s 3 permission, to continue certain dates in the Court’s case schedule as provided below. 4 In response to the Court’s recent Order denying the parties’ prior proposed amended 5 schedule and directing the parties to further meet and confer (Dkt. 50 in Case 3:16-cv-00506-WHO, 6 at 4), counsel further met and conferred and jointly communicated with Ms. Davis by email 7 regarding scheduling. The net result is that Ms. Davis has advised that the Court is available for 8 tutorial and claim construction hearings on September 22 and 29, 2017, respectively, and these are 9 the first dates offered by the Court that are also available to both parties. To accommodate this 10 proposed change, and mindful of the Court’s requirement that there be at least three months between 11 the dispositive motions hearing date and trial (id.), the parties respectfully propose the amended case 12 schedule below. 13 In view of the proposed continued dates for the tutorial and claim construction hearings, the 14 parties’ proposal would extend various dates by generally corresponding amounts, including the 15 dates for the close of fact discovery and the exchange of expert reports. The parties’ proposal would 16 allow at least three months between the proposed date for hearings on dispositive motions and the 17 first proposed trial date. In light of the proposed revised schedule, the parties also propose that each 18 party have an additional week to file the opposition and reply claim construction briefs, which 19 briefing would be complete more than three months before the proposed tutorial and claim 20 construction hearing dates. 21 More specifically, the parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court modify the 22 following dates in the case schedule as provided below (all other dates in the Court’s schedule to 23 remain unchanged): 24 25 26 27 28 Event Deadline to Amend Pleadings FOX Factory Opening Claim Construction Brief SRAM Responsive Brief FOX Factory Reply Briefs Tutorial Hearing Claim Construction Hearing Current Date April 21, 2017 April 27, 2017 May 11, 2017 May 18, 2017 June 2, 2017 June 9, 2017 Proposed New Date July 21, 2017 April 27, 2017 (same) May 18, 2017 June 1, 2017 September 22, 2017 September 29, 2017 -1Case Nos. 3:16-CV-03716WHO & 3:16-CV-00506-WHO JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 Event Close of Fact Discovery Initial Expert Reports (on issues upon which party bears burden of proof) Rebuttal Expert Reports Motion for Consolidation Close of Expert Discovery Last Day to File Dispositive Motions Dispositive Motions heard by Current Date September 29, 2017 Proposed New Date December 20, 2017 October 20, 2017 January 25, 2018 November 20, 2017 November 21, 2017 December 22, 2017 January 22, 2018 February 28, 2018 Pretrial Conference April 30, 2018 Trial May 29, 2018 and June 25, 2018 February 26, 2018 January 31, 2018 March 30, 2018 April 25, 2018 May 30, 2018 August 16, 2018, subject to the Court’s availability September and October 2018, approximately one month apart and subject to the Court’s availability 7 8 9 10 11 Respectfully submitted, 12 13 DATED: March 17, 2017 SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP 14 By: 15 16 /s/ Erick C. Howard Erick C. Howard Attorneys for Defendant SRAM, LLC 17 DATED: March 17, 2017 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 18 19 By: 20 21 /s/ Jeffrey D. Smyth Jeffrey D. Smyth Attorneys for Plaintiff FOX Factory, Inc. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Case Nos. 3:16-CV-03716WHO & 3:16-CV-00506-WHO JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER 1 2 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, except as modified below: 3 Pretrial Conference April 30, 2018 Trial May 29, 2018 and June 25, 2018 4 5 August 13, 2018 September 10, 2018 and November 5, 2018. 6 7 8 Dated: March 22, 2017 9 _____________________________ The Honorable William H. Orrick United States District Judge Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case Nos. 3:16-CV-03716-WHO & 3:16-CV-00506-WHO JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?