Rayter et al v. DeVry Education Group, Inc. et al
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation to Continue Initial Case Management Conference filed by DeVry University, Inc., DeVry Education Group, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 7/27/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/10/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 12, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
9
10
11 ALEX RAYTER and RYAN
HERENDEEN, individually and on behalf
12 of all others similarly situated,
13
14
Plaintiffs,
vs.
15 DEVRY EDUCATION GROUP INC.,
formerly known as DeVry, Inc., a
16 corporation, and DEVRY UNIVERSITY,
INC., a corporation,
17
Defendants.
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:16-cv-00507-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC
CASE NO. : 3:16-CV-00507-JST
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having considered the Joint Stipulation by Plaintiffs Alex Rayter and Ryan Herendeen
3 (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants DeVry Education Group Inc., and DeVry University, Inc.,
4 (“Defendants”) to Continue the Initial Case Management Conference, and for good cause
5 appearing therefore,
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
7
August 10
The Initial Case Management Conference is continued until __________, 2016. The Case
8 Management Conference Statement will be due ten days before the Case Management Conference.
UNIT
ED
11
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
10 Dated: ______________________
May 12, 2016
DERED
SO OR S. Tigar
The Honorable Jon
IT IS
12
13
United States District Court Judge
ER
H
16
17
S . Ti ga r
LI
RT
15
n
J u d ge J o
FO
NO
14
R NIA
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A
9
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC
CASE NO. : 3:16-CV-00507-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?