Rayter et al v. DeVry Education Group, Inc. et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation to Continue Initial Case Management Conference filed by DeVry University, Inc., DeVry Education Group, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 7/27/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/10/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 12, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 9 10 11 ALEX RAYTER and RYAN HERENDEEN, individually and on behalf 12 of all others similarly situated, 13 14 Plaintiffs, vs. 15 DEVRY EDUCATION GROUP INC., formerly known as DeVry, Inc., a 16 corporation, and DEVRY UNIVERSITY, INC., a corporation, 17 Defendants. 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:16-cv-00507-JST [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC CASE NO. : 3:16-CV-00507-JST 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER Having considered the Joint Stipulation by Plaintiffs Alex Rayter and Ryan Herendeen 3 (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants DeVry Education Group Inc., and DeVry University, Inc., 4 (“Defendants”) to Continue the Initial Case Management Conference, and for good cause 5 appearing therefore, 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 August 10 The Initial Case Management Conference is continued until __________, 2016. The Case 8 Management Conference Statement will be due ten days before the Case Management Conference. UNIT ED 11 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 10 Dated: ______________________ May 12, 2016 DERED SO OR S. Tigar The Honorable Jon IT IS 12 13 United States District Court Judge ER H 16 17 S . Ti ga r LI RT 15 n J u d ge J o FO NO 14 R NIA IT IS SO ORDERED. A 9 N F D IS T IC T O R C 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC CASE NO. : 3:16-CV-00507-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?