Hardeman v. Monsanto Company et al

Filing 74

SCHEDULING ORDER. Dispositive and Daubert Motion Hearing set for 5/11/2017 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Vince Chhabria. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 6/24/2016. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2016)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EDWARD HARDEMAN, Case No. 16-cv-00525-VC Plaintiff, SCHEDULING ORDER v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Defendant. ELAINE STEVICK, et al., Case No. 16-cv-02341-VC Plaintiffs, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Defendant. The following schedule will govern Phase I in these related cases: July 15, 2016: Monsanto completes non-custodial production and provides privilege log. August 1, 2016: Monsanto begins custodial file production. October 4, 2016, 2:30 pm: Further case management conference (telephonic). October 15, 2014: Monsanto completes custodial file production and provides privilege logs. December 9, 2016: Depositions of non-experts completed. January 9, 2017: Plaintiffs' expert reports due. January 23, 2017: Defendants' expert reports due. February 6, 2017: Plaintiffs' rebuttal expert reports due. March 1, 2017: Close of expert discovery. March 15, 2017: Monsanto's motion for summary judgment and Daubert motions due (one brief, 40 pages). April 5, 2017: Oppositions (and cross motions, if any) due (one consolidated brief per plaintiff, 30 pages each). April 19, 2017: Monsanto's reply (and opposition to cross motions, if any) due (one consolidated brief, 50 pages). April 28, 2017: Replies due (one consolidated brief per plaintiff, 30 pages each). Week of May 8, 2017: Possible live testimony from expert witnesses. May 11, 2017: Oral argument on motions for summary judgment and Daubert motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 24, 2016 ______________________________________ VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?