Bates et al v. Rite Aid Corporation
Filing
50
ORDER OF DISMISSAL (pursuant to 49 stipulation) by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2016)
1
2
3
4
MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 983-0900
Facsimile: (415) 397-9005
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
9
10
11
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838)
JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502)
JESSE C. FERRANTELLA (Cal. State Bar No. 279131)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-3441
Telephone:
(415) 856-7000
Facsimile:
(415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
justinscott@paulhastings.com
jesseferrantella@paulhastings.com
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
NEIL BATES, JOSEPH ZANELLA, DAVID
VLASIC, ALLEN DAVENPORT, SUSAN
ALLEN, and STEVE DULANEY,
20
21
22
No. 3:16-cv-00561-WHA (JCS)
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Plaintiffs,
Judge:
Dept.:
vs.
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Honorable William Alsup
8
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
May 21, 2015
May 15, 2017
23
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. NO. 3:16-cv-00561-WHA (JCS)
LEGAL_US_W # 87759616.1
1
2
3
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,
IT IS ORDERED that this action be and herby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side
hereby
to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
4
5
Dated:
November 28, 2016.
.
William Alsup
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. NO. 3:16-cv-00561-WHA (JCS)
LEGAL_US_W # 87759616.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?