Tomcik et al v. Brookstone Stores, Inc.

Filing 16

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/17/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2016)

1
2
3
4
5

NANCY HERSH, State Bar No. 49091
CHARLES KELLY, State Bar No. 122253
HERSH & HERSH
A Professional Corporation
601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2080
San Francisco, CA 94102-6316
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICHAEL TOMCIK, CONNIE TOMCIK

6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA- SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9

10

MICHAEL TOMCIK, CONNIE TOMCIK,

ll

~§
p:;

·~

Ei31
QU

~1
::r1 .,
if)JJ

O::d:

Ei3"

Plaintiffs,

12

vs.

13

BROOKSTONE STORES, INC.,

14

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NUMBER 3:16-CV-00570 LB
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED]
ORDER

15 ~---------------------->
Pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(l )(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS
16
17

HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs MICHAEL TOMCIK and CONNIE

18

TOMCIK, and Defendant BROOKS TONE STORES, INC., through their respective counsel

19

or record, that the above-captioned action is dismissed, v.dth prejudice and that it is further

20

stipulated that the parties shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs incurred in this action.

21

DATED: March 16, 2016

22

HERSH & HER ..
A Professionai C
/ ,{/
-'

~2 (/
t'

/

23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED:

March~-> 2016

LEWIS msBOIS tfGAARD & SMI~ LLP

By~~~-~-Nora M. Nachtsheirn
Attorneys for def. BROOKSTONE STORES, INC.

- 1-

==~====~~~==~~~==~=:-----­
STIPULATION OF !DSMJSSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED) ORDER

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
March 17,
3 DATED: .................................

2016

-~~----

4
5
6

7
8
9

10
11

::c
(/)

12
g

p::; ·n

~~
::c
0

13

~~
::c ·-

14

~~

16

CI)Jl
p::;o

15
17
18
19

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
------------------------···

STIPULATION OF !DSMISSAL WlTH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER