Aslan v. Life Insurance Company of North America

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 1 Complaint, To Extend Time For Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Life Insurance Company of North America. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/4/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

RIMAC MARTIN, P.C.
Anna M. Martin– CSBN 154279
[e-mail]
1051 Divisadero Street
San Francisco, CA 94115
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
NORTH AMERICA

7
8
9
10
11
12

KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
GLENN R. KANTOR – CSBN 122643
[e-mail]
ALAN E. KASSAN – CSBN 113864
[e-mail]
MITCHELL O. HEFTER – CSBN 291985
[e-mail]
19839 Nordoff Street
Northridge, CA 91324
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiff
JACQUES ASLAN

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTH DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

JACQUES ASLAN,

19

Plaintiff,

20
v.
21
22
23

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH
AMERICA,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:16-cv-00576-EMC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
SECOND REQUEST

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their
respective attorneys that Defendant LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
may have one additional week within which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s

1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00576-EMC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

complaint. Therefore, the last day for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s
complaint shall be April 13, 2016. Good cause exists as attorney for Defendant has been
diligently working on depositions in an out of state and requires additional time to review
documents and other information in order to properly respond to the complaint. This extension
will not impact any deadlines set by this Court.
This document is being electronically filed through the Court’s ECF System. In this
regard, counsel for Defendant hereby attests that (1) the content of this document is acceptable to
all persons required to sign the document; (2) Plaintiff has concurred with the filing of this
document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is available for inspection or production
if so ordered.
Respectfully submitted,

12
RIMAC MARTIN, P.C.
13
DATED: April 4, 2016

By:

DATED: April 4, 2016

By: /s/ Glenn R. Kantor_______
GLENN R. KANTOR
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JACQUES ASLAN

14
15

/s/ Anna M. Martin
ANNA M. MARTIN
Attorneys for Defendant
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
NORTH AMERICA

16
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED:

S

28

ER

H

27

2

R NIA

dwar
Judge E

FO

RT

26

en

d M. Ch

NO

25

IT I

LI

24

__________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
RED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT RDE
S SO O JUDGE

UNIT
ED

23

RT
U
O

22

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

21

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00576-EMC