David Weisberg v. Stripe, Inc.
Filing
27
ORDER VACATING HEARING re 21 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Stripe, Inc. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/27/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 21, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2016)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
DAVID WEISBERG,
Case No. 16-cv-00584-JST
Plaintiff,
5
ORDER VACATING HEARING
v.
6
7
STRIPE, INC.,
Re: ECF No. 21
Defendant.
8
Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint.
10
ECF No. 21. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
9
Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter,
12
currently scheduled for June 30, 2016, is hereby VACATED.
13
If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date
14
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
15
been licensed to practice law for five or fewer years, and who has not previously presented
16
argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient
17
to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the
18
party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the
19
Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
In light of this order, the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for June 30,
2016, is hereby continued to July 27, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 21, 2016
_____________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?