Cuisinier v. Colvin
Filing
12
ORDER FOR PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER RE: STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/9/2016. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2016)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
CANDACE F CUISINIER,
Case No. 16-cv-00585-MEJ
Plaintiff,
5
ORDER RE: STATEMENT OF
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
v.
6
7
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Defendant.
8
9
As set forth in the Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions (Dkt. No. 11), this
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
matter will be deemed submitted for decision without oral argument based on the parties’ motions
12
for summary judgment and/or remand. In connection with their motions, the parties shall file
13
either a joint statement or separate statements of the Administrative Record, summarizing: (1) the
14
procedural history of the case; (2) testimonial evidence from the hearing(s) before the
15
Administrative Law Judge; and (3) all relevant medical evidence of record. Accordingly, the
16
Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer within 21 days of service of Defendant’s answer
17
for the purpose of determining whether they are able to file a joint statement of the Administrative
18
Record or whether it is necessary for the parties to file separate statements.
19
A.
Joint Statement of the Administrative Record
If the parties are able to agree on a joint statement of the Administrative Record, the
20
21
statement shall be signed by both parties and filed by the same deadline as Plaintiff’s motion for
22
summary judgment or for remand. Each fact must be set forth in a separately numbered paragraph
23
and cite to a specific portion of the Administrative Record where the fact finds support.
24
B.
25
26
Separate Statements of the Administrative Record
If the parties are unable to agree on a joint statement, they shall comply with the following
requirements for separate statements of the Administrative Record.
Plaintiff’s Separate Statement of the Administrative Record
27
1.
28
At the time Plaintiff files the motion for summary judgment or for remand, Plaintiff must
1
also file a statement, separate from the motion and memorandum of law, setting forth each fact
2
from the Administrative Record on which Plaintiff relies in support of the motion. Each fact must
3
be set forth in a separately numbered paragraph and cite to a specific portion of the Administrative
4
Record where the fact finds support. A failure to submit a separate statement in this form may
5
constitute grounds for denial of the motion.
Defendant’s Separate Statement of the Administrative Record
6
2.
7
At the time Defendant files the cross-motion for summary judgment or for remand,
8
Defendant must also file a statement, separate from the motion and memorandum of law, setting
9
forth: (a) for each paragraph of Plaintiff’s separate statement, a correspondingly numbered
paragraph indicating whether Defendant disputes the statement of fact as set forth by Plaintiff and,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
if disputed, a reference to the specific portion of the Administrative Record supporting
12
Defendant’s position; and (b) any additional facts from the Administrative Record on which
13
Defendant relies in support of the motion. Each additional fact must be set forth in a separately
14
numbered paragraph and cite to a specific portion of the Administrative Record where the fact
15
finds support.
16
3.
Reply Statement of Facts
17
If Defendant sets forth additional facts in the cross-motion, Plaintiff shall file a statement,
18
separate from the reply brief, with correspondingly numbered paragraphs indicating whether
19
Plaintiff disputes the statement of fact as set forth by Defendant and, if disputed, a reference to the
20
specific portion of the Administrative Record supporting Plaintiff’s position.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
Dated: March 9, 2016
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?