Ortegon v. Colvin
Filing
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CASE BY PLAINTIFF. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/12/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2016)
1
4
Katherine R. Siegfried, SBN 250558
Law Office of Katherine Siegfried
1814 Franklin St, Suite 210
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: (510) 465-0018
Fax: (510) 465-0017
kat@siegfriedlegal.com
5
Attorney for Plaintiff, OSCAR YANEZ ORTEGON
2
3
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
OSCAR YANEZ ORTEGON
9
Plaintiff,
10
CIVIL NO. 16-CV-590- LB
v.
11
CAROLYN COLVIN,
Commissioner of Social Security,
12
Defendant
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF CASE BY PLAINTIFF AND
PROPOSED ORDER
13
On February 3, 2016 Mr. Ortegon filed a Social Security appeal pursuant to Title 42,
14
15
U.S.C. Section 405(g). Mr. Ortegon now wishes to voluntarily dismiss this matter in its entirety
16
without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a).
Respectfully submitted,
17
18
Dated: 10/11/2016
KATHERINE SIEGFRIED 1
Attorney for Plaintiff OSCAR YANEZ
ORTEGON
19
20
21
22
23
/s/ Katherine Siegfried
Dated: 10/11/2016
/s/ Ellinor Coder
_________________________________________-----------------------------------------------ELLINOR CODER
Attorney for Defendant, CAROLYN
COLVIN
24
25
1
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature
(/S/) within this efiled document.
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF MATTER BY PLAINTIFF; 16-CV-590-LB
1
1
PROPOSED ORDER
2
3
In accordance with the stipulation by both parties, I hereby dismiss the Matter of Ortegon v.
Colvin, 16-CV-590-LB.
4
5
Dated:
October 12, 2016
___________---------------------------Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF MATTER BY PLAINTIFF; 16-CV-590-LB
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?