Ivey v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
Filing
33
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 30 Stipulation selecting Mediation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No.: 3:16-CV-00610-HSG
DOUGLAS K. IVEY
Plaintiff(s),
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR
PROCESS
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al.
Defendant(s).
/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably
more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference
and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil
Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private ADR (please identify process and provider)______________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the
case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
other requested deadline November 2016______________________________________
Dated: 4/27/2016
John S. Sargetis
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: 4/27/2016
Goli Mahdavi
Attorney for Defendant
SF01DOCS\277697.1
Dated: 4/27/2016
Leticia “Tia” Butler
Attorney for Defendant
Quality Loan Service Corporation
[PROPOSED] ORDER
X
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 5/12/2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g.,
“Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
SF01DOCS\277697.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?