Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. NETGEAR

Filing 60

ORDER, Motions terminated: 59 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Reschedule Case Management Conference filed by ChriMar Systems Inc, ChriMar Holding Company LLC. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/22/2016 02:30 PM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 3/23/16. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Bruce J. Zabarauskas, SBN. 248601
THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP
707 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 4100
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Justin S. Cohen (pro hac vice)
Richard L. Wynne, Jr. (pro hac vice)
THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP
1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

10
11

Richard L. Seabolt (SBN 67469)
DUANE MORRIS LLP
One Market Plaza, Suite 2200
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.354.3317
L. Norwood Jameson (admitted pro hac vice)
Matthew S. Yungwirth (admitted pro hac vice)
S. Neil Anderson (admitted pro hac vice)
DUANE MORRIS LLP
1075 Peachtree Street, Suite 2000
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 404.253.6901
Arvind Jairam (admitted pro hac vice)
DUANE MORRIS LLP
505 9th Street, N.W., Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.403.3665

12
E-Mail: [e-mail]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

13
14
15

Attorneys for Defendant
NETGEAR, Inc.

16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
20
21

CHRIMAR SYSTEMS, INC., et al.,
Case No. 3:16-cv-00624-SI
Plaintiffs,

22
23
24
25

vs.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

NETGEAR, INC.,
Defendant.

26
27

In accordance with Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiffs Chrimar Systems, Inc. and

28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00624-SI

1

Chrimar Holding Company (collectively, “Chrimar”) and Defendant NETGEAR, Inc.

2

(“NETGEAR”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

3

On July 1, 2015, Chrimar filed suit against various defendants in the Eastern District of

4

Texas alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,155,012, 8,942,107, 8,902,760, and 9,019,838

5

(collectively, the “Patents-in-Suit”).

6

Four of the cases have been transferred to the Northern District of California, and are

7

presently before this Court: Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al. v. Juniper Networks, Inc., Case No. 3:16-

8

cv-00558-SI (N.D. Cal.); Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al. v. Ruckus Wireless, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-

9

186-SI (N.D. Cal.); Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al. v. NETGEAR, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-624-SI

10

(N.D. Cal.); Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al. v. Fortinet, Inc., Case No. 3:16-cv-00897-SI (N.D. Cal.)

11

(collectively, the “N.D. Cal. Chrimar Cases”).

12

The Court has set the four N.D. Cal. Chrimar cases for case management conferences

13

(“CMCs”) on four separate dates: April 15, 2016 (Case No. -897); April 22, 2016 (Case No. 186);

14

May 6, 2016 (Case No. -558); and May 20, 2016 (Case No. -624).

15

Counsel for the parties in all of the N.D. Cal. Chrimar Cases have conferred and believe

16

that there would be benefits to the Court and the parties to schedule the CMCs for all of the cases

17

scheduled on the same date, and at the Court’s convenience, at the same time if possible.

18

Counsel for the parties in all of the N.D. Cal. Chrimar Cases are available for CMC on

19

April 22, 2016, which is the date the Court had set the CMC for the Chrimar v. Ruckus case (No.

20

3:16-cv-186). Accordingly, if the Court’s schedule permits, counsel for the parties in this action

21

have agreed to reschedule the CMC currently set for May 20, 2016, to April 22, 2016, at or near

22

2:30 p.m., when the Ruckus CMC is currently scheduled.

23
24

No prior changes to the schedule have been made since this action was transferred to this
Court.

25

Because the Court has not entered a Scheduling Order in any of the four N.D. Cal.

26

Chrimar Cases, the requested time modification will have no effect on the schedule for this or any

27

of the cases.

28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00624-SI

1

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED, that the CMC in this case shall be

2

rescheduled to April 22, 2016, at 2:30 p.m. and the related deadline for filing a joint CMC

3

statement is adjusted to April 15, 2016.

4
Respectfully submitted,

Respectfully submitted,

7

/s/ Richard L. Wynne, Jr.
Richard L. Wynne, Jr.
Thompson & Knight LLP

/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth w/perm. R. Wynne
Matthew S. Yungwirth
Duane Morris LLP

8

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Counsel for Defendant NETGEAR, Inc.

5
6

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00624-SI

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2

Case No. 3:16-cv-00624-SI

3
4

STATE OF TEXAS, COUNTY OF DALLAS

6

I am employed in the County of Dallas, State of Texas. I am over the age of 18 and not a
party to the within action. My business address is 1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500, Dallas, Texas
75201. On April 21, 2015, I served documents described as follows:

7

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Reschedule Case Management Conference

5

8
9
10
11

I served the document listed above on the interested parties below, using the following
means:
[X]

(By Court’s CM/ECF System) Pursuant to Local Rule, I electronically filed
the documents with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which
sent notification of that filing to the persons listed on the CM/ECF service list.

12
13
14

I declare under penalty of perjury under 28 U.S.C. § 1746 that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Executed on March 18, 2016, at Dallas, Texas.

15
16
17

/s/ Richard L. Wynne, Jr.
Richard L. Wynne, Jr.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00624-SI

1
2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5

March 23

Dated: __________, 2016
THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00624-SI