Weiss v. See's Candy Shops, Inc. et al

Filing 49

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 48 Stipulated Request to Continue Further Case Management Conference and Hearing and Briefing Deadlines on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed by See's Candies Inc. Responses due by 5/17/2017. Replies due by 5/31/2017. Motion Hearing and CMC set for 6/22/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/31/17. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2017)

Download PDF
1 David C. Parisi (SBN 162248) dparisi@parisihavens.com 2 Suzanne Havens Beckman (SBN 188814) shavens@parisihavens.com 3 PARISI & HAVENS LLP 4 212 Marine Street, Suite 100 Santa Monica, CA 90405 5 Telephone: (818) 990-1299 Facsimile: (818) 501-7852 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Avi Weiss, 7 individually and on behalf of a class of 8 similarly situated individuals (Additional counsel on signature page) 9 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership 10 Including Professional Corporations 11 NEIL A.F. POPOVIĆ, Cal. Bar No. 132403 ERIC J. DiIULIO, Cal. Bar No. 301439 12 Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4109 415.434.9100 13 Telephone: Facsimile: 415.434.3947 npopovic@sheppardmullin.com 14 Email: ediiulio@sheppardmullin.com 15 Attorneys for Defendants 16 SEE’S CANDY SHOPS, INC. and SEE’S CANDIES INC. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 AVI WEISS, individually and on behalf of a 21 class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, 22 23 v. 24 SEE’S CANDY SHOPS INC., SEE’S CANDIES INC., and DOES 1 through 5, 25 Defendants. 26 27 Case No. 16-cv-00661-EMC CLASS ACTION STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING AND BRIEFING DEADLINES ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Assigned Hon. Edward M. Chen Complaint filed: February 9, 2016 Trial Date: TBD 28 Case No. 16-cv-00661-EMC SMRH:482194818.2 STIP REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC, HEARING, & BRIEFING DEADLINES 1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 2 Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, plaintiff Avi 3 Weiss and defendants See’s Candies, Inc. and See’s Candy Shops, Inc. (collectively “See’s”), by 4 and through their respective counsel, hereby respectfully stipulate and jointly request that the 5 Court continue the further case management conference as well as the hearing and briefing 6 deadlines on See’s motion to dismiss as set out below. 7 RECITALS 8 WHEREAS, on March 16, 2017, the Court continued: (1) the deadline for plaintiff to 9 oppose See’s motion to dismiss to fourteen days after the Court ruled on the parties’ discovery 10 dispute; (2) the deadline for See’s to reply in support of its motion to dismiss to 28 days after the 11 discovery ruling; and (3) the hearing on See’s motion to dismiss from April 27, 2017 to May 25, 12 2017 at 1:30 p.m. Dkt. 45. 13 WHEREAS, the Court ruled on the parties discovery dispute on March 20, 2017. Dkt. 47. 14 WHEREAS, See’s is gathering the information necessary to amend its responses pursuant 15 to the Court’s discovery ruling, but, as the Easter holiday is a tremendously busy time for See’s, it 16 may not be able to produce complete responses until May 3, 2017. 17 WHEREAS, plaintiff’s deadline to oppose See’s motion to dismiss is currently April 3, 18 2017 and See’s deadline to reply is currently April 17, 2017. 19 WHEREAS, based on the current schedule plaintiff would be required to oppose See’s 20 motion to dismiss before See’s produces amended responses. 21 WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agreed to extend plaintiff’s deadline to 22 oppose See’s motion to dismiss from April 3, 2017 until May 17, 2017 and See’s deadline to reply 23 in support of its motion to dismiss from April 17, 2017 until May 31, 2017. 24 WHEREAS, the proposed briefing schedule will require a continuance of the further case 25 management conference and the hearing on See’s motion to dismiss. Counsel for both parties are 26 available to attend the hearing on June 22, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. and request that the Court continue 27 the hearing and further case management conference to that date. 28 / / / -1SMRH:482194818.2 Case No. 16-cv-00661-EMC STIP REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC, HEARING, & BRIEFING DEADLINES 1 WHEREAS, prior modifications of time in this case occurred:  2 3 on February 29, 2016, when the parties agreed to extend See’s deadline to respond the complaint to April 4, 2016 (Dkt. 15);  4 5 on May 20, 2016, when the Court granted the parties’ request to continue the initial case management conference from June 2, 2016 until August 18, 2016 (Dkt. 26);  6 on February 22, 2017, when the Court granted the parties’ request to continue the 7 hearing on See’s motion to dismiss from April 13, 2017 to April 27, 2017 (Dkt. 8 41); and  9 on March 16, 2017, when the Court granted the parties’ request to continue: (1) 10 plaintiff’s deadline to oppose See’s motion to dismiss from March 16, 2017 until 11 14 days after it resolved the parties discovery dispute; (2) See’s deadline to reply in 12 support of its motion to dismiss from March 30, 2017 to 28 days after the Court 13 resolved the parties discovery dispute; and (3) the further case management 14 conference and hearing on See’s motion to dismiss from April 27, 2017 to May 25, 15 2017. 16 WHEREAS, the continuance requested herein will not otherwise affect the schedule for the 17 case. 18 WHEREAS, defendants’ counsel Eric DiIulio attests that Suzanne Havens Beckman 19 concurs in filing this stipulation. 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / -2SMRH:482194818.2 Case No. 16-cv-00661-EMC STIP REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC, HEARING, & BRIEFING DEADLINES 1 2 STIPULATION NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, by and 3 through their respective counsel, that plaintiff’s deadline to oppose See’s motion to dismiss is 4 extended from April 3, 2017 until May 17, 2017, See’s deadline to reply in support of its motion 5 to dismiss is extended from April 17, 2017 until May 31, 2017, and the further case management 6 conference and hearing on See’s motion to dismiss be continued from May 25, 2017 to June 22, 7 2017 at 1:30 p.m. 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 9 10 Dated: March 30, 2017 Parisi & Havens, LLP 11 By 13 /s/ Suzanne Havens Beckman David C. Parisi Suzanne Havens Beckman 14 -and- 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 Dated: March 30, 2017 Yitzchak H. Lieberman (SBN 277678) Grace E. Parasmo (pro hac vice) gparasmo@parasmoliebermanlaw.com PARASMO LIEBERMAN LAW 7400 Hollywood Blvd, #505 Los Angeles, CA 90046 Telephone: (917) 657-6857 Facsimile: (877) 501-3346 Attorneys for Plaintiff SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 21 22 By Neil A.F. Popović Eric J. DiIulio 23 24 Attorneys for Defendants 25 26 27 28 -3 SMRH:482194818.2 Case No. 16-cv-00661-EMC STIP REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC, HEARING, & BRIEFING DEADLINES [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 3 DATED: 3/31 , 2017 UNIT ED 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S Edward M. Chen ED United States O ORDER S District Judge dward Judge E NO 8 RT 9 ER 11 n M. Che H 10 R NIA 7 IT IS FO 6 LI 4 A 2 N D IS T IC T R OF C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4SMRH:482194818.2 Case No. 16-cv-00661-EMC STIP REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC, HEARING, & BRIEFING DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?