Byard et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 89

ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT AS MODIFIED by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part #88 Administrative Motion extend page limit.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2017)

1
2
3

THE LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL BAKONDI
Daniel A. Bakondi (SBN 242043)
870 Market Street, Suite 1157 San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiffs

4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

San Francisco Patrol Special Police Officers Alan
3:16-cv-00691
Byard, an individual; Officer Robert L. Burns, an
individual; Officer Calvin C. Wiley, an individual; Formerly San Francisco Case No. CGC 13Officer John J. Andrews, an individual; Officer Scott 528788
Hart, an individual; Officer Todd Hart, an individual;
Officer Samuel J. Reyes, Sr. an individual; Officer Originally filed as Contra Costa Case
Theodore Torres, an individual; Officer John Barry, an C12 - 01656
No.
individual; Officer Serge J. White, an individual; the
San Francisco Patrol Special Police Officers Alliance,
a public benefit corporation; the San Francisco Patrol Order Re:
Special Police Officers Association Inc., a public
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
benefit corporation, and San Francisco Patrol Special MOTION UNDER RULE 7-11 TO
Police, an unincorporated association; Officer Hanley EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FROM 25 TO
Chan, an individual; Officer Earl L. Curtis, an
30 IN THEIR OPPOSITION TO
individual; Officer Anthony Cirimele, an individual; DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
Officer John Fitzinger, an individual;
SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
Plaintiffs,
as modified
v.
Trial Date: May 8, 2017
The City and County of San Francisco, A Public
moved to May 22, 2017
Incorporation; The San Francisco Police Department,
A Public Incorporation; Sergeant Gerald Darcy, an
individual; Inspector Martin Ohalloran, an individual;
Sergeant Ueugen Geleano, an individual; Sergeant
John Bragagnolo, an individual; Sergeant Jesus Peña,
an individual; Officer Michael Simmons, an
individual; Sergeant Peter Thoshinsky, an individual;
Officer John Van Koll, an individual; Officer
Thomas Cunnane, an individual; Officer Randy Ly,
an individual; and DOES 1 through 10,000, inclusive;
Defendants,

25
26
27
28

Order re:

0

Motion, Patrol Special Police v. City and County of San Francisco, 3:16 cv00691WHA

e

Relief Requested
1

Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Court to allow Plaintiffs’ Opposition brief to Defendants’

2

Summary Judgment Motion to be up to 30 pages long. Plaintiffs seek this relief due to the large

3

number and complexity of issues and facts they must present, and are trying to be as succinct as

4

possible. Defendants’ counsel said she would not likely oppose.

5
6

Respectfully submitted,

7

March 22, 2017

8

THE LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL BAKONDI
___/s/ Daniel A. Bakondi, Esq. ___________

9

Daniel A. Bakondi, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Order re:

1

Motion, Patrol Special Police v. City and County of San Francisco, 3:16 cv00691WHA

e

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ administrative motion to extend Plaintiffs’ Opposition brief page

3

limit from 25 to 30 pages.

4
5
6

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Plaintiffs’ administrative motion to allow Plaintiffs’ brief to be
28
up to 30 pages in length in their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is
GRANTED.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10
11

March 22, 2017.
Dated: _____________
By:____________________________ HON. WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Order re:

3

Motion, Patrol Special Police v. City and County of San Francisco, 3:16 cv00691WHA

e