Jones v. Nutiva, Inc.

Filing 41

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 39 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2016)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRESTON JONES , on behalf of
himself, all others similarly situated,
and the general public,

CASE NO. 16-CV-00711-HSG

Plaintiff(s),

v.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

NUTIV A, INC.,
Defendant(s).

------------------------~'
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
0
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
0
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
0
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form . They must instead file a Notice ofNeedfor
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
X
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Mediation with a mediator to
be determined.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
0
the presumptive deadline (!'he deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
X

Dated:

other requested deadline December 9, 2016

~f}r fl'
r I

Dated: 4/25/2016
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER
X
D
D

The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 4/26/2016
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."

Rev. 12/11

Page 2 of2