Jones v. Nutiva, Inc.

Filing 65

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 64 Stipulation re: Proposed Scheduling Order. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11
12

PRESTON JONES, on behalf of himself, all
others similarly situated, and the general
public,

13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,

Case No: 3:16-cv-00711-HSG
SCHEDULING ORDER

v.
Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

NUTIVA, INC.,
Defendant.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Jones v. Nutiva, Inc., No. 16-cv-00711-HSG
SCHEDULING ORDER

1

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and for good cause shown, the Court adopts the

2

parties’ proposed schedule through class certification. Accordingly, the case schedule is as

3

follows.

4
5

Event

Date

Deadline to file motion for leave to amend pleadings

December 5, 2016

Deadline to disclose experts (including reports) to be used
in support of or opposition to class certification 1

May 8, 2017

Deadline to disclose rebuttal experts (including reports) to
be used in support of or in opposition to class certification

July 7, 2017

Last date to file class certification motion

Thursday, July 27, 2017
August 14, 2017

13

Deadline for completing depositions of opening and rebuttal
experts whose testimony will be used to support or oppose
class certification

14

Deadline to file opposition to class certification motion

4 weeks after motion filed

15

Deadline to file reply in support of class certification motion

7 weeks after motion filed

Hearing on class certification motion

9 weeks after motion filed

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

16
17

The Court will set the remainder of the case schedule after its decision on plaintiff’s

18
19

anticipated motion for class certification.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22

Dated: October 11, 2016

23

________________________
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28

1

This deadline is without prejudice to the parties requesting a deadline for further expert
disclosures in support of their claims or defenses following the Court’s decision on class
certification, provided however, that any further expert testimony shall not be duplicative of
the subject matter of expert testimony on which the parties rely to support or oppose class
certification.
1
Jones v. Nutiva, Inc., No. 16-cv-00711-HSG
SCHEDULING ORDER