Cisneros v. Vangilder et al

Filing 26

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING M 21 OTION TO CONSIDER CASES AS RELATED AND CONSOLIDATE CASES; GRANTING MOTION TO CHANGE TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DANIEL CISNEROS, Plaintiff, 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 v. J. VANGILDER, et al., Defendants. 12 Case No. 16-cv-00735-HSG (PR) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONSIDER CASES AS RELATED AND CONSOLIDATE CASES; GRANTING MOTION TO CHANGE TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION Re: Dkt. No. 21 13 14 15 16 17 Defendants move this Court to consider whether the four Vangilder cases, as set forth below, should be related, and move this Court to consolidate the Vangilder cases for all purposes. The following matters are referred to, collectively with the present matter, Cisneros v. Vangilder, et al., No. C 16-0735 HSG (PR), as the “Vangilder cases”: 18 Falla v. Ducart, et al., No. C 16-0869 JST (PR); 19 Manriquez v. Vangilder, et al., No. C 16-1320 MEJ (PR); and 20 Chaidez v. Vangilder, et al., No. C 16-1330 NJV (PR) 21 After full consideration, and good cause appearing, defendants’ motion to consider 22 23 whether the cases should be related and to consolidate is GRANTED. All of the Vangilder cases shall be related, and shall be consolidated for all purposes. The 24 Clerk shall notify the parties to the Vangilder cases that the cases are related, shall reassign all 25 later-filed Vangilder cases to this Court, and shall notify the parties and the affected judges 26 accordingly. 27 28 The parties are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the 1 2 initials of the newly assigned judge (“HSG”) after the case number. The dispositive motion briefing schedules currently set in Cisneros v. Vangilder, et al., No. 3 C 16-0735 HSG (PR) and Chaidez v. Vangilder, et al., No. C 16-1330 NJV (PR) are VACATED. 4 The Court will set a new briefing schedule after the operative complaints in Falla v. Ducart, et al., 5 No. C 16-0869 JST (PR) and Manriquez v. Vangilder, et al., No. C 16-1320 MEJ (PR) are 6 screened and served. 7 This order terminates Docket No. 21. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: September 27, 2016 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 DANIEL CISNEROS, Case No. 16-cv-00735-HSG Plaintiff, 5 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 6 7 J. VANGILDER, et al., Defendants. 8 9 10 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 That on September 27, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 18 Daniel Cisneros ID: V-78318 FSP B4-A3-15 P.O. Box 715071 Represa, CA 95671 19 20 21 Dated: September 27, 2016 22 23 Susan Y. Soong Clerk, United States District Court 24 25 26 27 By:________________________ Nikki D. Riley, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?