Brickman v. Facebook, Inc.
Filing
49
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR FACEBOOK'S MOTION TO DISMISS re 47 Proposed Order filed by Colin R. Brickman. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 7/21/16. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Patrick J. Perotti (Pro Hac Vice)
Frank A. Bartela (Pro Hac Vice)
DWORKEN & BERNSTEIN CO., L.P.A.
60 South Park Place
Painesville, Ohio 44077
Telephone: (440) 352-3391
Facsimile: (440) 352-3469
Email: pperotti@dworkenlaw.com
fbartela@dworkenlaw.com
Kristen Law Sagafi (SBN 222249)
Martin D. Quiñones (SBN 293318)
TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP
483 Ninth Street, Suite 200
Oakland, CA 94607
Tel.: (510) 254-6808
Fax: (202) 973-0950
ksagafi@tzlegal.com
mquinones@tzlegal.com
14
Hassan A. Zavareei (SBN 181547)
TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP
2000 L Street, N.W., Suite 808
Washington, DC 20036
Tel.: (202) 973-0900
Fax: (202) 973-0950
hzavareei@tzlegal.com
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff COLIN BRICKMAN
12
13
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
COLIN BRICKMAN, individually and as a
representative of all others similarly situated,
21
22
23
24
Case No. 3:16-cv-00751
Plaintiff,
PROPOSED ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
FACEBOOK’S MOTION TO DISMISS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH PARTIES JOINT
STIPULATION (ECF NO. 42)
Defendant.
The Honorable Thelton E. Henderson
v.
FACEBOOK, INC.,
25
Date Action Filed:
February 12, 2016
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:16-cv-00751
1
1
2
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), plaintiff Colin Brickman (“Plaintiff”) and defendant
Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”), through their undersigned counsel, jointly stipulated as follows:
3
4
1. The parties stipulated to allow Plaintiff to file his First Amended Complaint no later
5
than July 8, 2016 (ECF No. 42).
6
2. The parties also jointly stipulated to the following briefing schedule for Facebook’s
7
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 42):
8
9
August 9, 2016: Deadline for Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss;
10
September 9, 2016: Deadline for Plaintiff’s Opposition;
11
October 10, 2016: Deadline for the United States to intervene and oppose any
constitutional issue raised by Defendant’s motion to dismiss; and
12
October 24, 2016: Deadline for Facebook to file its response to both Plaintiff’s
opposition and the United States’ intervention.
13
14
15
3. The parties also agreed that Facebook’s response to both Plaintiff’s opposition and the
16
United States’ intervention would be made in a single brief and Facebook shall have
17
25 pages to respond to both briefs (ECF No. 42).
18
Based on the parties’ joint stipulation (ECF No. 42), the Court finds that the Plaintiff’s
19
First Amended Complaint has been filed (ECF No. 43), and hereby orders that the briefing
20
deadlines for Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (ECF. No. 43)
21
are set as described above and that Facebook shall respond to both Plaintiff’s opposition and the
22
United States’ intervention in a single brief not to exceed 25 pages.
23
24
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated:
7/21
, 2016
THE HONORABLE THELTON E. HENDERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE.
Case No. 3:16-cv-00751
1
1
Dated: July 21, 2016
DWORKEN & BERNSTEIN CO., L.P.A.
2
3
By: s/Frank A. Bartela
Attorneys for Plaintiff
COLIN BRICKMAN
4
5
6
Dated: July 21, 2016
KIRKLAND & ELLIS
LLP
7
8
By: s/Devin S. Anderson (with permission)
Attorneys for Defendant
FACEBOOK, INC.
9
10
11
ECF ATTESTATION
12
I, Frank A. Bartela, am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file this
13
document. I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the
14
signatory.
15
Dated: July 21, 2016
16
By: s/ Frank A. Bartela
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE.
Case No. 3:16-cv-00751
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?