Lassalle et al v. McNeilus Truck & Manufacturing, Inc. et al

Filing 53

ORDER granting 52 STIPULATION TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES. Close of Fact Discovery: 3/31/2017. Dispositive Motions to be heard by 7/5/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/27/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2017)

Download PDF
Matthew D. Haley, Esq., THE HALEY LAW OFFICES A Professional Corporation State Bar No. 104493 1633 San Pablo Avenue Oakland, CA 94512-1505 Telephone: (415) 444-1881 Facsimile: (510) 444-5108 Email: matt@haleylaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION JENNIFER LASSALLE; EMILY ANNE LASSALLE; MADELINE ELIZABETH LASSALLE, a minor and GRACE CAROLINE LASSALLE, a minor by and through their Guardian ad Litem ADOLPH ADRAGNA, JR. Plaintiffs, v. MCNEILUS TRUCK AND MANUFACTURING, INC., AUTOCAR, LLC; and Does 1 to 200, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 3:16-cv-00766-WHO STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES Date: Time: Courtroom: Hon.: March 29, 2017 2:00 p.m. 2- 17th Floor William H. Orrick Courtroom: A-15th Floor Action Filed: September 16, 2015 Action Removed: February 17, 2016 Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the current deadlines as follows: Fact Discovery cutoff: March 31, 2017 Expert Disclosure: April 10, 2017 Expert Rebuttal: April 20, 2017 Expert Discovery cutoff: May 20, 2017 Dispositive motion heard by: July 2, 2017 Trial: 3824542.1 4426-3.3988 September 5, 2017 (no change) Case No. 3:16-cv-00766-WHO STIPULATON AND ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULING DEADLINES The parties make this request because the parties need additional time to complete witness depositions. Over 20 Fact depositions have been taken but some witnesses have not been cooperative and additional time has been needed to get their depositions. There are approximately 5 of those. Those depositions need to be completed and provided to the experts. All sides have pursued discovery cooperatively and diligently and continue to do so with approximately 5 depositions noticed to proceed over the next 2 weeks. The parties have worked together to notice and schedule depositions and have been faced with an inordinate amount of difficulty in serving deponents and securing necessary testimony. Compounding the issues of deponent delays, the experts have not been given the opportunity to evaluate the testimony and prepare their reports, and defendant McNeilus has been delayed in the evaluation of the need and propriety of a motion for summary judgment. The parties met and conferred and agreed that the extension of time listed above is necessary. Premised upon these facts, and the diligence of the parties working jointly, the parties request that deadlines be continued as follows: Fact Discovery cutoff: March 31, 2017 Expert Disclosure: April 10, 2017 Expert Rebuttal: April 20, 2017 Expert Discovery cutoff: May 20, 2017 Dispositive motion heard by: July 5, 2017 Trial: 3824542.1 4426-3.3988 September 5, 2017 (no change) Case No. 3:16-cv-00766-WHO STIPULATON AND ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULING DEADLINES The parties have conferred and jointly agree to this extension. SO STIPULATED: Date: March 9, 2017 Matthew D. Haley, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff SO STIPULATED: Date: Elizabeth V. McNulty, Esq. Attorney for Defendant PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: March 27, 2017 3824542.1 4426-3.3988 The Honorable Willliam H. Orrick Judge of the District Court Case No. 3:16-cv-00766-WHO STIPULATON AND ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULING DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?