Lassalle et al v. McNeilus Truck & Manufacturing, Inc. et al
Filing
53
ORDER granting 52 STIPULATION TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES. Close of Fact Discovery: 3/31/2017. Dispositive Motions to be heard by 7/5/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/27/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2017)
Matthew D. Haley, Esq.,
THE HALEY LAW OFFICES
A Professional Corporation
State Bar No. 104493
1633 San Pablo Avenue
Oakland, CA 94512-1505
Telephone: (415) 444-1881
Facsimile: (510) 444-5108
Email: matt@haleylaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
JENNIFER LASSALLE; EMILY ANNE
LASSALLE; MADELINE ELIZABETH
LASSALLE, a minor and GRACE
CAROLINE LASSALLE, a minor by and
through their Guardian ad Litem ADOLPH
ADRAGNA, JR.
Plaintiffs,
v.
MCNEILUS TRUCK AND
MANUFACTURING, INC., AUTOCAR,
LLC; and Does 1 to 200, inclusive,
Defendants,
Case No. 3:16-cv-00766-WHO
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER
DEADLINES
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Hon.:
March 29, 2017
2:00 p.m.
2- 17th Floor
William H. Orrick
Courtroom: A-15th Floor
Action Filed:
September 16, 2015
Action Removed: February 17, 2016
Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the current
deadlines as follows:
Fact Discovery cutoff:
March 31, 2017
Expert Disclosure:
April 10, 2017
Expert Rebuttal:
April 20, 2017
Expert Discovery cutoff:
May 20, 2017
Dispositive motion heard by:
July 2, 2017
Trial:
3824542.1
4426-3.3988
September 5, 2017 (no change)
Case No. 3:16-cv-00766-WHO
STIPULATON AND ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULING DEADLINES
The parties make this request because the parties need additional time to complete witness
depositions. Over 20 Fact depositions have been taken but some witnesses have not been cooperative
and additional time has been needed to get their depositions. There are approximately 5 of those.
Those depositions need to be completed and provided to the experts.
All sides have pursued discovery cooperatively and diligently and continue to do so with
approximately 5 depositions noticed to proceed over the next 2 weeks. The parties have worked
together to notice and schedule depositions and have been faced with an inordinate amount of
difficulty in serving deponents and securing necessary testimony. Compounding the issues of
deponent delays, the experts have not been given the opportunity to evaluate the testimony and
prepare their reports, and defendant McNeilus has been delayed in the evaluation of the need and
propriety of a motion for summary judgment.
The parties met and conferred and agreed that the extension of time listed above is necessary.
Premised upon these facts, and the diligence of the parties working jointly, the parties request that
deadlines be continued as follows:
Fact Discovery cutoff:
March 31, 2017
Expert Disclosure:
April 10, 2017
Expert Rebuttal:
April 20, 2017
Expert Discovery cutoff:
May 20, 2017
Dispositive motion heard by:
July 5, 2017
Trial:
3824542.1
4426-3.3988
September 5, 2017 (no change)
Case No. 3:16-cv-00766-WHO
STIPULATON AND ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULING DEADLINES
The parties have conferred and jointly agree to this extension.
SO STIPULATED:
Date: March 9, 2017
Matthew D. Haley, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
SO STIPULATED:
Date:
Elizabeth V. McNulty, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: March 27, 2017
3824542.1
4426-3.3988
The Honorable Willliam H. Orrick
Judge of the District Court
Case No. 3:16-cv-00766-WHO
STIPULATON AND ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULING DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?