International Test Solutions, Inc v. MIPOX International Corporation et al

Filing 149

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 148 to Continue Dates In Scheduling Order [Dkt. 127]. Further Case Management Conference previously set for 12/7/2017 continued to 5/10/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Selection/Trial p reviously set for 6/4/2018 continued to 12/10/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Judge Richard Seeborg. Pretrial Conference previously set for 5/24/2018 continued to 11/29/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Judge Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/13/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP DAVID S. BLOCH (SBN: 184530) dbloch@winston.com AMANDA L. GROVES (SBN: 187216) agroves@winston.com 101 California Street, San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 591-1000 Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 JAMES C. LIN (SBN: 271673) jalin@winston.com 275 Middlefield Rd., Suite 205 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 858-6500 Facsimile: (650) 858-6550 10 LOWELL D. JACOBSON (Pro Hac Vice) ljacobson@winston.com 35 W. Wacker Dr., Chicago IL 60601 Telephone: (312) 558-5600 Facsimile: (312) 558-5700 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff INTERNATIONAL TEST SOLUTIONS, INC. 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP THOMAS J. DONOVAN (Pro hac vice) thomas.donovan@btlaw.com MARK A. HAGEDORN (Pro hac vice) mark.hagedorn@btlaw.com One N. Wacker Dr., Ste 4400, Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (312) 357-1313 Facsimile: (312) 759-5646 ROYA RAHMANPOUR (SBN 285076) roya.rahmanpour@btlaw.com 2029 Century Park East, Ste 300, L.A., CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 284-3880 Facsimile: (310) 284-3894 Attorneys for Defendants MIPOX CORP., MIPOX INTERNATIONAL CORP., and MGN INTERNATIONAL, INC. 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 22 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 23 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 24 25 26 27 28 INTERNATIONAL TEST SOLUTIONS, INC. Plaintiff, v. MIPOX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, MGN INTERNATIONAL, INC., and MIPOX CORPORATION Case No.: 3:16-cv-00791-RS JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER Action Filed: February 17, 2016 Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg Defendants. JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER - CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-00791-RS 1 MIPOX CORPORATION, 2 3 v. Counter-Plaintiff, INTERNATIONAL TEST SOLUTIONS, INC., 4 Counter-Defendant. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER - CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-00791-RS 1 Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff International Test Solutions, Inc. (“ITS”) and 2 Defendants Mipox International Corporation (“Mipox”), MGN International, Inc. (“MGN”), and 3 Mipox Corporation (“Mipox Japan”) (collectively, “Parties”), through their respective undersigned 4 counsel, hereby stipulate1 and request an order to continue the dates in the operating scheduling 5 order (Dkt. No. 143) as set forth below. The efforts between the Parties to reach a settlement have 6 been unsuccessful, and thus, the Parties request a continuance of dates in the scheduling order to 7 allow enough time for discovery and trial to resume in this matter. The Parties are submitting a 8 proposed schedule for the Court’s consideration. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate through 9 their respective counsel of record as follows: 10 11 WHEREAS, on May 18, 2017, this Court entered the operating case management scheduling order (Dkt. No. 127); 12 WHEREAS, on August 1, 2017, the Parties participated in a mediation session in which the 13 result was that the Parties believed that a settlement was likely imminent (Dkt. No. 135), and the 14 Parties subsequently worked on finalizing a written settlement agreement to settle the case; 15 16 WHEREAS, on September 1, 2017, the USPTO ordered that inter partes review is granted as to claims 1-4 and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 8,801,869; 17 18 WHEREAS, on September 8, 2017, the Parties stipulated to modifying the operating case management scheduling order to focus on finalizing a written settlement agreement; 19 WHEREAS, on September 11, 2017, the USPTO ordered that inter partes review is granted 20 as to claims 2 and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 7,202,683 and that inter partes review is granted as to claims 21 26 and 28 of U.S. Patent No. 6,777,966; 22 23 WHEREAS, on October 18, 2017, ITS informed Mipox, MGN, and Mipox Japan that the Parties are unable to come to an agreement to settle the case; 24 1 25 26 27 28 The parties previously stipulated to extend time for disclosure of invalidity contentions (Dkt. No. 39), to extend time for the parties’ joint claim construction and prehearing statement (Dkt. No. 44), to extend the time for filing of the opening claim construction brief (Dkt. No. 57), and to extend the time for responsive and reply claim construction briefs (Dkt. No. 64). The Court previously granted a Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and continued the Markman hearing (Dkt. No. 70). Magistrate Judge Spero granted the Parties’ request for continuances of a court-ordered meet and confer relating to a discovery dispute issue. (Dkt. Nos. 137 and 141). Finally, the Court granted the parties’ joint stipulation to continue dates in the scheduling order. (Dkt. No. 143). 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER - CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-00791-RS 1 WHEREAS, ITS represents that several additional months of discovery is required for the 2 Parties and the Court to properly assess the merits of this case, including additional time (a) to 3 accommodate the additional foreign discovery through the Hague convention that is required for this 4 case, such as seeking discovery from Mipox Japan’s Korean manufacturer and discovery from 5 Mipox Japan’s Japanese supplier, (b) for ITS to take depositions of Mipox Japan, which Mipox 6 Japan insists be taken in Japan, and (c) for Mipox, MGN, and Mipox Japan to depose ITS’s 7 witnesses and to complete their discovery; 8 9 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties hereto that the operating case management scheduling order be modified as follows: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Event Current Deadline Close of Fact Discovery Exchange of Expert Reports (From Party Having Burden of Proof) Rebuttal of Expert Reports Close of Expert Discovery Further Case Management Conference Deadline for filing Dispositive Motions, including Daubert Motions and Motions for Preliminary Injunction Hearing of Dispositive Motions, including Daubert Motions and Motions for Preliminary Injunction Pretrial Conference November 28, 2017 December 28, 2017 Trial Stipulated Proposed Deadline May 1, 2018 May 31, 2018 January 15, 2018 February 12, 2018 December 7, 2017 at 10:00 AM February 16, 2018 June 28, 2018 August 3, 2018 May 10, 2018 at 10:00 AM Thursday, March 29, 2018 at 1:30 PM Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 1:30 PM Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 10:00 AM June __, 2018 Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 10:00 AM 10 December __, 2018 August 31, 2018 at 9:00 am 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER - CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-00791-RS 1 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP By: /s/ David S. Bloch Amanda L. Groves David S. Bloch Lowell D. Jacobson James C. Lin Attorneys for Plaintiff International Test Solutions, Inc. Date: November 9, 2017 2 3 4 5 6 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP By: /s/ Thomas J. Donovan Thomas J. Donovan Mark A. Hagedorn Roya Rahmanpour Attorneys for Defendants Mipox Corporation, Mipox International Corporation, and MGN International, Inc. Date: November 9, 2017 7 8 9 10 CONCURRENCE IN FILING 11 I, David S. Bloch, hereby attest that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been 12 obtained from each signatory hereto. 13 Date: November 9, 2017 14 By: /s/ David S. Bloch Davis S. Bloch 15 16 17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 11/13/17 By: Richard Seeborg UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER - CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-00791-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?