International Test Solutions, Inc v. MIPOX International Corporation et al
Filing
149
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 148 to Continue Dates In Scheduling Order [Dkt. 127]. Further Case Management Conference previously set for 12/7/2017 continued to 5/10/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Selection/Trial p reviously set for 6/4/2018 continued to 12/10/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Judge Richard Seeborg. Pretrial Conference previously set for 5/24/2018 continued to 11/29/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Judge Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/13/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
DAVID S. BLOCH (SBN: 184530)
dbloch@winston.com
AMANDA L. GROVES (SBN: 187216)
agroves@winston.com
101 California Street, San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
(415) 591-1000
Facsimile:
(415) 591-1400
JAMES C. LIN (SBN: 271673)
jalin@winston.com
275 Middlefield Rd., Suite 205
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 858-6500
Facsimile:
(650) 858-6550
10
LOWELL D. JACOBSON (Pro Hac Vice)
ljacobson@winston.com
35 W. Wacker Dr., Chicago IL 60601
Telephone: (312) 558-5600
Facsimile:
(312) 558-5700
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
INTERNATIONAL TEST SOLUTIONS, INC.
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
THOMAS J. DONOVAN (Pro hac vice)
thomas.donovan@btlaw.com
MARK A. HAGEDORN (Pro hac vice)
mark.hagedorn@btlaw.com
One N. Wacker Dr., Ste 4400, Chicago, IL 60606
Telephone:
(312) 357-1313
Facsimile:
(312) 759-5646
ROYA RAHMANPOUR (SBN 285076)
roya.rahmanpour@btlaw.com
2029 Century Park East, Ste 300, L.A., CA 90067
Telephone:
(310) 284-3880
Facsimile:
(310) 284-3894
Attorneys for Defendants
MIPOX CORP.,
MIPOX INTERNATIONAL CORP.,
and MGN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
21
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
22
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
23
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
24
25
26
27
28
INTERNATIONAL TEST SOLUTIONS,
INC.
Plaintiff,
v.
MIPOX INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,
MGN INTERNATIONAL, INC., and MIPOX
CORPORATION
Case No.: 3:16-cv-00791-RS
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES IN
SCHEDULING ORDER
Action Filed: February 17, 2016
Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg
Defendants.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER - CASE
NO.: 3:16-CV-00791-RS
1
MIPOX CORPORATION,
2
3
v.
Counter-Plaintiff,
INTERNATIONAL TEST SOLUTIONS, INC.,
4
Counter-Defendant.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER - CASE
NO.: 3:16-CV-00791-RS
1
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff International Test Solutions, Inc. (“ITS”) and
2
Defendants Mipox International Corporation (“Mipox”), MGN International, Inc. (“MGN”), and
3
Mipox Corporation (“Mipox Japan”) (collectively, “Parties”), through their respective undersigned
4
counsel, hereby stipulate1 and request an order to continue the dates in the operating scheduling
5
order (Dkt. No. 143) as set forth below. The efforts between the Parties to reach a settlement have
6
been unsuccessful, and thus, the Parties request a continuance of dates in the scheduling order to
7
allow enough time for discovery and trial to resume in this matter. The Parties are submitting a
8
proposed schedule for the Court’s consideration. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate through
9
their respective counsel of record as follows:
10
11
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2017, this Court entered the operating case management scheduling
order (Dkt. No. 127);
12
WHEREAS, on August 1, 2017, the Parties participated in a mediation session in which the
13
result was that the Parties believed that a settlement was likely imminent (Dkt. No. 135), and the
14
Parties subsequently worked on finalizing a written settlement agreement to settle the case;
15
16
WHEREAS, on September 1, 2017, the USPTO ordered that inter partes review is granted as
to claims 1-4 and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 8,801,869;
17
18
WHEREAS, on September 8, 2017, the Parties stipulated to modifying the operating case
management scheduling order to focus on finalizing a written settlement agreement;
19
WHEREAS, on September 11, 2017, the USPTO ordered that inter partes review is granted
20
as to claims 2 and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 7,202,683 and that inter partes review is granted as to claims
21
26 and 28 of U.S. Patent No. 6,777,966;
22
23
WHEREAS, on October 18, 2017, ITS informed Mipox, MGN, and Mipox Japan that the
Parties are unable to come to an agreement to settle the case;
24
1
25
26
27
28
The parties previously stipulated to extend time for disclosure of invalidity contentions (Dkt. No.
39), to extend time for the parties’ joint claim construction and prehearing statement (Dkt. No. 44),
to extend the time for filing of the opening claim construction brief (Dkt. No. 57), and to extend the
time for responsive and reply claim construction briefs (Dkt. No. 64). The Court previously granted
a Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and continued the Markman hearing (Dkt. No. 70).
Magistrate Judge Spero granted the Parties’ request for continuances of a court-ordered meet and
confer relating to a discovery dispute issue. (Dkt. Nos. 137 and 141). Finally, the Court granted the
parties’ joint stipulation to continue dates in the scheduling order. (Dkt. No. 143).
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER - CASE
NO.: 3:16-CV-00791-RS
1
WHEREAS, ITS represents that several additional months of discovery is required for the
2
Parties and the Court to properly assess the merits of this case, including additional time (a) to
3
accommodate the additional foreign discovery through the Hague convention that is required for this
4
case, such as seeking discovery from Mipox Japan’s Korean manufacturer and discovery from
5
Mipox Japan’s Japanese supplier, (b) for ITS to take depositions of Mipox Japan, which Mipox
6
Japan insists be taken in Japan, and (c) for Mipox, MGN, and Mipox Japan to depose ITS’s
7
witnesses and to complete their discovery;
8
9
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties hereto that the operating case
management scheduling order be modified as follows:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Event
Current Deadline
Close of Fact Discovery
Exchange of Expert Reports
(From Party Having Burden of
Proof)
Rebuttal of Expert Reports
Close of Expert Discovery
Further Case Management
Conference
Deadline for filing Dispositive
Motions, including Daubert
Motions and Motions for
Preliminary Injunction
Hearing of Dispositive
Motions, including Daubert
Motions and Motions for
Preliminary Injunction
Pretrial Conference
November 28, 2017
December 28, 2017
Trial
Stipulated Proposed
Deadline
May 1, 2018
May 31, 2018
January 15, 2018
February 12, 2018
December 7, 2017 at 10:00
AM
February 16, 2018
June 28, 2018
August 3, 2018
May 10, 2018 at 10:00 AM
Thursday, March 29, 2018 at
1:30 PM
Thursday, October 11, 2018 at
1:30 PM
Thursday, May 24, 2018 at
10:00 AM
June __, 2018
Thursday, November 29, 2018
at 10:00 AM
10
December __, 2018
August 31, 2018
at 9:00 am
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER - CASE
NO.: 3:16-CV-00791-RS
1
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
By: /s/ David S. Bloch
Amanda L. Groves
David S. Bloch
Lowell D. Jacobson
James C. Lin
Attorneys for Plaintiff
International Test Solutions, Inc.
Date: November 9, 2017
2
3
4
5
6
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
By: /s/ Thomas J. Donovan
Thomas J. Donovan
Mark A. Hagedorn
Roya Rahmanpour
Attorneys for Defendants
Mipox Corporation, Mipox
International Corporation, and MGN
International, Inc.
Date: November 9, 2017
7
8
9
10
CONCURRENCE IN FILING
11
I, David S. Bloch, hereby attest that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been
12
obtained from each signatory hereto.
13
Date: November 9, 2017
14
By: /s/ David S. Bloch
Davis S. Bloch
15
16
17
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: 11/13/17
By:
Richard Seeborg
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES IN SCHEDULING ORDER - CASE
NO.: 3:16-CV-00791-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?