International Test Solutions, Inc v. MIPOX International Corporation et al
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO DISCLOSE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/22/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
Thomas J. Donovan (admitted pro hac vice)
thomas.donovan@btlaw.com
Roya Rahmanpour Bar, No. 285076
roya.rahmanpour@btlaw.com
2029 Century Park East, Suite 300
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone:
310. 284.3880
Facsimile:
310. 284.3894
Attorneys for Defendants
MIPOX INTERNATIONAL CORP.
and MGN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
Dean A. Morehous, Bar No. 111841
dean.morehous@troutmansanders.com
Charanjit Brahma, Bar No. 204771
charanjit.brahma@troutmansanders.com
Marcus T. Hall, Bar No. 206495
marcus.hall@troutmansanders.com
580 California Street, 11th floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415.477.5700
Facsimile:
415.477.5710
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
David S. Bloch, Bar No. 184530
dbloch@winston.com
Amanda L. Groves, Bar No. 187216
agroves@winston.com
101 California Street, Suite 3400
San Francisco, CA 94111-5840
Telephone: (415) 591-1000
Facsimile: (415) 591-1400
Attorneys for Plaintiff
INTERNATIONAL TEST SOLUTIONS, INC.
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
INTERNATIONAL TEST SOLUTIONS,
INC.,
Case No. 3:16-cv-00791-RS
20
Plaintiff,
21
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME TO DISCLOSE
INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
22
23
MIPOX INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION and MGN
INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
24
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff International Test Solutions, Inc., (“ITS”)
and Defendants Mipox International Corporation (“Mipox”) and MGN International, Inc.
(“MGN”) (collectively, “Parties”), through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate
and request an order extending the due date for Defendant Mipox and MGN’s Patent L.R. 3-3
Invalidity Contentions and Patent L.R. 3-4 Document Productions Accompanying Disclosure of
Invalidity Contentions by two weeks, from July 25, 2016 to August 8, 2016. This extension of time
will provide Mipox and MGN the time necessary to prepare and complete the Invalidity
Contentions and accompanying production. The requested time modification would change no
other due dates and would have no effect on the remaining schedule for the case. Accordingly, the
Parties hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Case Management Scheduling Order entered May 26,
2016, and pursuant to the Patent Local Rules, the current due date for the Mipox and MGN’s
Invalidity Contentions and accompanying production of documents is July 25, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the Mipox and MGN require additional time to prepare their Document
Productions Accompanying Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions and Invalidity Contentions, and
ITS, through its counsel of record, has agreed to extend the due date for Document Productions
Accompanying Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions and Invalidity Contentions the by two weeks,
from July 25, 2016 to August 8, 2016;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties hereto that Mipox and MGN
shall have to and including August 8, 2016, to serve their Document Productions Accompanying
Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions and Invalidity Contentions.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Dated: July 22, 2016
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
2
By: /s/ Amanda L. Groves
Amanda L. Groves
Attorneys for Plaintiff
International Test Solutions, Inc.
3
4
5
6
Dated: July 22, 2016
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
7
8
By: /s/ Roya Rahmanpour
Thomas J. Donovan
Roya Rahmanpour
Attorneys for Defendants
Mipox International Corporation and MGN
International, Inc.
9
10
11
12
13
14
CONCURRENCE IN FILING
I, Roya Rahmanpour, hereby attest that the concurrence to the filing of this document has
been obtained from each signatory hereto.
15
16
Dated: July 22, 2016
/s/ Roya Rahmanpour
Roya Rahmanpour
17
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
20
21
Dated: 7/22/16
____________________________________
Richard Seeborg
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?