Whitsitt v. Tesla Motors Inc. et al

Filing 56

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TESLA MOTORS INC. TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 12/22/16. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2016) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/22/2016: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WILLIAM J. WHITSITT, Plaintiff, 8 9 v. WEST VALLEY STAFFING GROUP, et al., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Case No. 16-cv-00797-MMC ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TESLA MOTORS INC. TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S STANDING ORDERS Defendants. 12 13 On December 16, 2016, defendant Tesla Motors Inc. ("Tesla") electronically filed 14 its "Reply Brief In Support of Motion to Dismiss." Tesla has violated the Civil Local Rules 15 of this District and the Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing "to provide for 16 chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked 17 'Chambers Copy'." See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases 18 Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ΒΆ 2. 19 Tesla is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the 20 Court's Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above- 21 referenced document. Tesla is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with 22 the Court's Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically filed 23 document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the 24 record any electronically filed document for which a chambers copy has not been timely 25 provided to the Court. 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 22, 2016 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?