Whitsitt v. Tesla Motors Inc. et al
Filing
56
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TESLA MOTORS INC. TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 12/22/16. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2016) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/22/2016: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT,
Plaintiff,
8
9
v.
WEST VALLEY STAFFING GROUP, et
al.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Case No. 16-cv-00797-MMC
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT
TESLA MOTORS INC. TO SUBMIT
CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN
COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL
RULES AND COURT'S STANDING
ORDERS
Defendants.
12
13
On December 16, 2016, defendant Tesla Motors Inc. ("Tesla") electronically filed
14
its "Reply Brief In Support of Motion to Dismiss." Tesla has violated the Civil Local Rules
15
of this District and the Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing "to provide for
16
chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked
17
'Chambers Copy'." See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases
18
Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ΒΆ 2.
19
Tesla is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the
20
Court's Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-
21
referenced document. Tesla is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply with
22
the Court's Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically filed
23
document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the
24
record any electronically filed document for which a chambers copy has not been timely
25
provided to the Court.
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 22, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?