Whitsitt v. Tesla Motors Inc. et al

Filing 66

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing, no later than March 24, 2017, why the action should not be dismissed, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 03/10/17. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/10/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

WILLIAM J. WHITSITT,
Plaintiff,

8
v.

9
10
11

Case No. 16-cv-00797-MMC

WEST VALLEY STAFFING GROUP, et
al.,

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD
NOT BE DISMISSED

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12
13

On March 10, 2017, plaintiff William J. Whitsitt failed to appear as ordered at a

14

regularly scheduled case management conference in the above-titled action and,

15

additionally, failed to file a joint case management statement as ordered.1

16

Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing, no later

17

than March 24, 2017, why the action should not be dismissed, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of

18

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to prosecute.

19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22

Dated: March 10, 2017
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Counsel for defendants appeared at the case management conference, and
defendant West Valley Staffing Group filed a case management statement.