Villar v. Tipsor et al

Filing 10

ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/10/2016. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DARIO CAMPOS VILLAR, 7 Case No. 16-cv-00816-MEJ Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE 9 MICHAEL TIPSOR, et al., 10 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Plaintiff Dario Campos Villar filed this case on February 18, 2016, seeking damages 13 14 related to a car accident that occurred on November 10, 2015.1 He brought claims for “Insurance 15 Bad Faith, Personal Injury, Negle[c]t, Elder Abused, Damages, Intentional Tort, Plot, 16 Discrimination, [and] Intentional Plot.” Compl. at 1, Dkt. No. 1. However, because Plaintiff’s 17 Complaint appeared to only assert claims based on state tort law and named only defendants who 18 are California residents, the Court ordered him to show cause why this case should not be 19 dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 7. Plaintiff did not respond to the 20 Order, but instead filed a First Amended Complaint, once again asserting claims for Insurance Bad 21 Faith, Personal Injury, and Elder Abuse. Dkt. No. 9. There are two bases for federal subject matter jurisdiction: (1) federal question jurisdiction 22 23 under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and (2) diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Pursuant to the 24 federal question jurisdiction statute, district courts have original jurisdiction over all civil actions 25 arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 1331. For 26 1 27 28 Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Dkt. No. 8. Defendants have not been served, and are therefore not parties to the suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See Levy v. United States, 2012 WL 1439047, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2012); Third World Media, LLC v. Does 1-1568, 2011 WL 4344160, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2011). 1 diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, each plaintiff must be diverse from each defendant, 2 and the amount in controversy must exceed $75,000. 3 Plaintiff is a resident of this District, and at least one of the named Defendants is a resident of California. Thus, diversity jurisdiction is lacking. Further, Plaintiff’s First Amended 5 Complaint centers on allegations regarding the November 2015 car accident his insurance 6 company’s alleged bad faith failure to defend him. Plaintiff’s allegations of “breach of contract” 7 and “insurance bad faith” are based in state law, yet there is no diversity jurisdiction; thus, these 8 claims are properly brought in state court. Although Plaintiff uses words such as “Discrimination” 9 and “Violation of my Civil and Legal Rigth [sic]” that could be construed as an attempt to raise 10 federal claims, there are no allegations supporting such claims in his original or First Amended 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 4 Complaint. Accordingly, as the Court lacks jurisdiction, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT 12 PREJUDICE to filing in state court. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is 13 DENIED AS MOOT. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 17 18 Dated: March 10, 2016 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 DARIO CAMPOS VILLAR, Case No. 16-cv-00816-MEJ Plaintiff, 5 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 6 7 MICHAEL TIPSOR, et al., Defendants. 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on March 10, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 14 15 16 Dario Campos Villar 46 Cielito Drive San Francisco, CA 94134 17 18 19 20 Dated: March 10, 2016 Richard W. Wieking Clerk, United States District Court 21 22 23 By: ___________________________ Chris Nathan, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable MARIA-ELENA JAMES 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?