Arch Insurance Company v. Fahmy et al

Filing 21

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. The Court having considered the parties' respective written submissions and the arguments of counsel, and for the reasons stated by the Court on the record at the hearing, the Motion to Dismiss is denied. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 6, 2016. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2016)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS

v.
SARWAT “STEWART” FAHMY, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 14

Defendants.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 16-cv-00819-MMC

12
13

Before the Court is defendants Sarwat “Stewart” Fahmy and Fahmy Law Group’s

14

Motion to Dismiss, filed March 22, 2016, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules

15

of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Arch Insurance Company has filed opposition, to which

16

defendants have replied. The matter came on regularly for hearing on today’s date.

17

David A. Tartaglio of Musick, Peeler, & Garrett LLP appeared on behalf of plaintiff. Alan

18

L. Martini of Sheuerman, Martini, Tabari, Zenere, & Garvin appeared on behalf of

19

defendants.

20

The Court having considered the parties’ respective written submissions and the

21

arguments of counsel, and for the reasons stated by the Court on the record at the

22

hearing, the Motion to Dismiss is hereby DENIED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 6, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge