Tongarm v. Vizio, Inc. et al

Filing 23

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Central District of California. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2016)

Download PDF
Case MDL No. 2693 Document 106 Filed 04/18/16 Page 1 of 2 FILED 4/20/16 I hereby attest and certify on _________ that the foregoing document is full, true and correct copy of the original on file in my office, and in my legal custody. CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEPUTY CLERK CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL 4/20/16 on CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA cs MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION BY: ___________________ DEPUTY IN RE: VIZIO, INC., CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION MDL No. 2693 SACV16-739-JLS (KESx) (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −1) On April 7, 2016, the Panel transferred 9 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Central District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See (J.P.M.L. ). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been transferred to the Central District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Josephine L. Staton. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Central District of California and assigned to Judge Staton. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Central District of California for the reasons stated in the order of April 7, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Josephine L. Staton. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: Apr 18, 2016 Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel Case MDL No. 2693 Document 106 Filed 04/18/16 Page 2 of 2 IN RE: VIZIO, INC., CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION SCHEDULE CTO−1 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN CAN 3 3 16−00822 16−01201 Tongarm v. Vizio, Inc. et al Von Haden v. Vizio, Inc. et al 16−00381 STRADER v. VIZIO, INC. INDIANA SOUTHERN INS 1 MDL No. 2693

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?