Tongarm v. Vizio, Inc. et al
Filing
23
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Central District of California. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2016)
Case MDL No. 2693 Document 106 Filed 04/18/16 Page 1 of 2
FILED
4/20/16
I hereby attest and certify on _________
that the foregoing document is full, true
and correct copy of the original on file in
my office, and in my legal custody.
CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DEPUTY CLERK
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL 4/20/16
on
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
cs
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION BY: ___________________ DEPUTY
IN RE: VIZIO, INC., CONSUMER PRIVACY
LITIGATION
MDL No. 2693
SACV16-739-JLS (KESx)
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −1)
On April 7, 2016, the Panel transferred 9 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
Central District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1407. See (J.P.M.L. ). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been transferred to the
Central District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to
the Honorable Josephine L. Staton.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Central District of California and assigned to
Judge Staton.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Central District of California for the reasons stated in the order of April 7, 2016, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Josephine L. Staton.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Central District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall
be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL:
Apr 18, 2016
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
Case MDL No. 2693 Document 106 Filed 04/18/16 Page 2 of 2
IN RE: VIZIO, INC., CONSUMER PRIVACY
LITIGATION
SCHEDULE CTO−1 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS
DIST
DIV.
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN
CAN
3
3
16−00822
16−01201
Tongarm v. Vizio, Inc. et al
Von Haden v. Vizio, Inc. et al
16−00381
STRADER v. VIZIO, INC.
INDIANA SOUTHERN
INS
1
MDL No. 2693
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?