Codexis, Inc. v. EnzymeWorks, Inc. et al

Filing 173

ORDER granting 172 Stipulation. Motion Hearing as to 166 MOTION to Compel reset for 1/24/2018 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/28/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2017)

1

8

DOUGLAS E. LUMISH (Bar No. 183863)
[e-mail]
GABRIEL S. GROSS (Bar No. 254672)
[e-mail]
PATRICIA YOUNG (Bar No. 291265)
[e-mail]
LINFONG TZENG (Bar No. 281798)
[e-mail]
JIE WANG (Bar No. 306395)
[e-mail]
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: +1.650.463.2600

9

Attorneys for Plaintiff CODEXIS, INC.

2
3
4
5
6
7

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15

CODEXIS, INC.

16

Plaintiff,

17

v.

18
19
20
21
22

ENZYMEWORKS, INC., a California
corporation, ENZYMEWORKS, INC., a
Chinese corporation a/k/a SUZHOU
HANMEI BIOTECHNOLOGY CO. LTD
d/b/a ENZYMEWORKS, INC. (CHINA),
JUNHUA TAO, an individual, and
ANDREW TAO, an individual

CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00826-WHO
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE FOR
CODEXIS’S OMNIBUS MOTION TO
COMPEL DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO
RULE 37 AND DISCOVERY ORDERS (D.N.
166)

Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VA LLE Y

STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00826-WHO

1

Plaintiff Codexis, Inc. (“Codexis”), and Defendants EnzymeWorks, Inc. (U.S.), En-

2

zymeWorks, Inc. (China), Junhua Tao, and Andrew Tao (collectively, “Defendants”), by and

3

through their counsel, hereby agree and stipulate:

4

WHEREAS, the Court ordered the parties to file omnibus motions to compel discovery

5

by December 13, 2017 and scheduled a hearing for January 17, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. (See D.N. 159,

6

160.)

7
8

WHEREAS Codexis filed its Omnibus Motion to Compel Discovery Pursuant to Rule 37
and Court Orders (“Motion”) on December 13, 2017;

9

WHEREAS, Codexis’s lead counsel now have an unavoidable conflict with another hear-

10

ing that will cause them to be unavailable on January 17, 2018, which necessitates this stipulated

11

request to change the hearing date;

12

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and mutually agreed to reschedule the

13

hearing, with the Court’s permission, on the Court’s next available civil law and motion hearing

14

date which is one week later on January 24, 2018;

15

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND STIPULATE to, and re-

16

quest a Court order allowing, continuing the Motion hearing date to January 24, 2018 at 2:00

17

p.m.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VA LLE Y

STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00826-WHO

1

1

Dated: December 28, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

2

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

3

By

/s/ Gabriel S. Gross
Gabriel S. Gross
Attorneys for Plaintiff CODEXIS, INC.

4
5
6

Dated: December 28, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

7

LILAW INC.

8
By

/s/ J. James Li
Attorneys for Defendants ENZYMEWORKS,
INC. (U.S.), ENZYMEWORKS, INC.
(China), JUNHUA TAO, and ANDREW TAO

9
10
11
12

ATTESTATION

13

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the concurrence in the filing of

14

this document has been obtained from the other signatory, which shall serve in lieu of his signa-

15

ture.

16
17

Dated: December 28, 2017
By

18

/s/ Gabriel S. Gross
Gabriel S. Gross

19
20
21
22
23

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing for Codexis’s Omnibus Motion to Compel Discovery Pursuant to Rule 37 and Court Orders (D.N. 166) is hereby
reset to January 24, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.

24
25
26

Dated: __December 28, 2017___________
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Court Judge

27
28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VA LLE Y

2

STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00826-WHO