Codexis, Inc. v. EnzymeWorks, Inc. et al
Filing
43
ORDER granting 42 STIPULATION to continued hearing as to 34 MOTION to Dismiss. Motion Hearing continued to 6/29/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/26/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2016)
1
7
DOUGLAS E. LUMISH (Bar No. 183863)
doug.lumish@lw.com
GABRIEL S. GROSS (Bar No. 254672)
gabe.gross@lw.com
PATRICIA YOUNG (Bar No. 291265)
patricia.young@lw.com
PEI-HSIEN REN (Bar No. 294252)
pei-hsien.ren@lw.com
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: +1.650.328.4600
Facsimile: +1.650.463.2600
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff CODEXIS, INC.
2
3
4
5
6
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
CODEXIS, INC.
15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
18
19
20
21
ENZYMEWORKS, INC., a California
corporation, ENZYMEWORKS, INC., a
Chinese corporation a/k/a SUZHOU
HANMEI BIOTECHNOLOGY CO. LTD
d/b/a ENZYMEWORKS, INC. (CHINA), and
JUNHUA TAO, an individual,
CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00826-WHO
STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO
DISMISS TO JUNE 29, 2016
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VA LLE Y
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00826-WHO
1
Pursuant to United States District Court, Northern District of California Local Rules 6-
2
1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Codexis, Inc. (“Codexis”), and Defendants EnzymeWorks, Inc.
3
(U.S.), EnzymeWorks, Inc. (China), and Junhua Tao (collectively, “Defendants”), file this Stipu-
4
lation to Continue the Hearing On Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) to June 29,
5
2016.
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS, on April 29, 2016, Codexis filed a First Amended Complaint against Defendants;
WHEREAS, on May 13, 2016, Defendants filed its Motion (D.I. 34) with a hearing date
noticed for June 22, 2016;
10
WHEREAS, due to a scheduling conflict on the part of Counsel for Codexis, the parties
11
agree to reschedule the hearing date to Wednesday, June 29, 2016 at 2:00 p.m., pending the
12
Court’s approval.
13
14
15
16
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree that the hearing on the Motion originally scheduled for June 22, 2016, shall be continued to June 29, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.
Dated: May 25, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
17
18
By
/s/ Gabriel S. Gross
Gabriel S. Gross
19
20
21
22
23
Attorneys for Plaintiff CODEXIS, INC.
Dated: May 25, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
By
/s/ Ezekiel L. Rauscher
Ezekiel L. Rauscher
24
Attorneys for Defendants ENZYMEWORKS,
INC. (U.S.), ENZYMEWORKS, INC.
(China), and JUNHUA TAO
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VA LLE Y
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00826-WHO
1
ORDER
2
3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
May 26, 2016
Dated: ____________________
6
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Court Judge
7
8
ATTESTATION
9
10
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the concurrence in the filing of
11
this document has been obtained from the other signatory, which shall serve in lieu of his signa-
12
ture.
13
14
15
Dated: May 25, 2016
By
_/s/ Gabriel S. Gross_____
Gabriel S. Gross
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VA LLE Y
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00826-WHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?