Codexis, Inc. v. EnzymeWorks, Inc. et al

Filing 56

ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTES by Judge William H. Orrick settling 52 Discovery Letter Brief and 54 Discovery Letter Brief. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CODEXIS, INC., Case No. 16-cv-00826-WHO Plaintiff, 8 ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTES v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 52, 54 9 10 ENZYMEWORKS, INC., et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Defendants’ request for an order compelling plaintiff to “respond fully” to defendants’ 13 interrogatories one through four, Dkt. No. 52, is DENIED as unjustified and premature. See 14 Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., No. 14-cv-04741-RS (MEJ), 2016 WL 1039029, at *3-4 (N.D. Cal. 15 Mar. 15, 2016); United States v. Bazaarvoice, Inc., No. 13-cv-00133-EMC (LB), 2013 WL 16 1739472, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2013). 17 Defendants’ request for an order striking (1) all of plaintiff’s amended Identification of 18 Trade Secrets, and (2) paragraphs 3 and 5 of plaintiff’s original Identification of Trade Secrets, 19 Dkt. No. 54, is also DENIED. Any future amendment of plaintiff’s Identification of Trade Secrets 20 will require a showing of good cause. See Perlan Therapeutics, Inc. v. Superior Court, 178 Cal. 21 App. 4th 1333, 1350-51 (2009); Loop AI Labs Inc v. Gatti, No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR), 2015 22 WL 9269758, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2015). 23 In the future, lead trial counsel shall certify that they met and conferred concerning any 24 discovery dispute that is brought to me. They shall describe their personal efforts to resolve the 25 dispute and specify the length of their discussions. I hope that this procedure insures that the only 26 27 28 1 disputes requiring court intervention from this point forward are ones that trial counsel believe are 2 pivotal to the case. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 11, 2016 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?