Codexis, Inc. v. EnzymeWorks, Inc. et al
Filing
56
ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTES by Judge William H. Orrick settling 52 Discovery Letter Brief and 54 Discovery Letter Brief. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
CODEXIS, INC.,
Case No. 16-cv-00826-WHO
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER ON DISCOVERY DISPUTES
v.
Re: Dkt. Nos. 52, 54
9
10
ENZYMEWORKS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Defendants’ request for an order compelling plaintiff to “respond fully” to defendants’
13
interrogatories one through four, Dkt. No. 52, is DENIED as unjustified and premature. See
14
Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., No. 14-cv-04741-RS (MEJ), 2016 WL 1039029, at *3-4 (N.D. Cal.
15
Mar. 15, 2016); United States v. Bazaarvoice, Inc., No. 13-cv-00133-EMC (LB), 2013 WL
16
1739472, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2013).
17
Defendants’ request for an order striking (1) all of plaintiff’s amended Identification of
18
Trade Secrets, and (2) paragraphs 3 and 5 of plaintiff’s original Identification of Trade Secrets,
19
Dkt. No. 54, is also DENIED. Any future amendment of plaintiff’s Identification of Trade Secrets
20
will require a showing of good cause. See Perlan Therapeutics, Inc. v. Superior Court, 178 Cal.
21
App. 4th 1333, 1350-51 (2009); Loop AI Labs Inc v. Gatti, No. 15-cv-00798-HSG (DMR), 2015
22
WL 9269758, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2015).
23
In the future, lead trial counsel shall certify that they met and conferred concerning any
24
discovery dispute that is brought to me. They shall describe their personal efforts to resolve the
25
dispute and specify the length of their discussions. I hope that this procedure insures that the only
26
27
28
1
disputes requiring court intervention from this point forward are ones that trial counsel believe are
2
pivotal to the case.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 11, 2016
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?