Nilsen v. Paramo

Filing 9

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 6/6/2016. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 4/5/2016. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2016)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VANCE NILSEN, Case No. 16-cv-00865-VC Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. Re: Dkt. No. 1 DANIEL PARAMO, Defendant. Having considered the habeas petition and the petitioner's response to the Court's earlier order to show cause regarding jurisdiction, the Court concludes that the petition is not "so incredible or frivolous as to warrant summary dismissal." Hendricks v. Vasquez, 908 F.2d 490, 492 (9th Cir. 1990). The clerk is therefore ordered to serve a copy of the petition and all supporting materials on the respondent, and the respondent is ordered to file (and serve on the petitioner) an answer to the petition within 60 days of the date of this order. Respondent shall also file and serve a copy of all portions of the state-court record that are relevant in adjudicating the issues raised by the petition. If the petitioner wishes to file a traverse, he may do so within 30 days of the respondent's answer. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 5, 2016 ______________________________________ VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?