DataMotion Texas, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 55

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Hon. William Alsup granting 54 Motion to Dismiss.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 DATAMOTION TEXAS LLC, Plaintiff, 6 7 8 Case No. 3:16-cv-00928-WHA vs. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY et al., ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 9 Defendants. 10 11 12 On this day, Plaintiff DataMotion Texas LLC (“DataMotion”) and Defendants and 13 Counter-Plaintiffs Hewlett-Packard Company and Voltage Security, LLC (“HP”) announced to the 14 Court that they have resolved DataMotion’s claims for relief against HP asserted in the case and 15 HP’s claims, defenses and/or counterclaims for relief against DataMotion asserted in this case. 16 DataMotion and HP have therefore requested that the Court dismiss DataMotion’s claims for relief 17 against HP with prejudice and HP’s claims, defenses and/or counterclaims for relief against 18 DataMotion without prejudice, and with all attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses taxed against the 19 party incurring same. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their request 20 for dismissal should be granted. 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that DataMotion’s claims for relief against HP are 22 dismissed with prejudice and HP’s claims, defenses and/or counterclaims for relief against 23 DataMotion are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, 24 costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same. 25 26 Dated: March 21, 2016. United States District Judge Northern District of California 27 28 -1- Case No. 3:16-cv-00928-WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?