Forsyth v. Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) et al

Filing 61

STIPULATION AND ORDER 60 re Entry of Judgment and Defendants' Deadline to File Motion for Attorneys' Fees.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/28/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2016)

1 GLENN D. POMERANTZ (SBN 112503)
[e-mail]
2 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, Thirty-Fifth Floor
3 Los Angeles, California 90071-1560
Telephone:
[phone]
4 Facsimile:
[phone]
5 KELLY M. KLAUS (SBN 161091)
[e-mail]
6 ACHYUT J. PHADKE (SBN 261567)
[e-mail]
7 ADAM I. KAPLAN (SBN 268182)
[e-mail]
8 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor
9 San Francisco, California 94105-2907
Telephone:
[phone]
10 Facsimile:
[phone]
11 Attorneys for Defendants Motion Picture
Association of America, Inc., Walt Disney
12 Studios Motion Pictures, Paramount Pictures
Corporation, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc.,
13 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation,
Universal City Studios LLC, and Warner Bros.
14 Entertainment Inc.

K. LEE MARSHALL (SBN 277092)
[e-mail]
ROGER MYERS (SBN 146164)
[e-mail]
ALEXANDRA WHITWORTH (SBN 303046)
[e-mail]
BRYAN CAVE LLP
560 Mission Street, 25th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Tel: [phone] /Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant National Association
of Theatre Owners
DAVID SCHACHMAN (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
LAW OFFICES OF DAVID SCHACHMAN,
P.C.
55 West Monroe Street, Suite 2970
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Tel: [phone]/Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Timothy Forsyth

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17 TIMOTHY FORSYTH, individually and on behalf of a
class of similarly situated individuals,
18
Plaintiff,
19
vs.
20
MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION OF
21 AMERICA, INC., WALT DISNEY STUDIOS
MOTION PICTURES, PARAMOUNT
22 PICTURES CORPORATION, SONY
PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT INC.,
23 TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM
CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY
24 STUDIOS LLC, WARNER BROS.
ENTERTAINMENT INC., and NATIONAL
25 ASSOCIATION OF THEATRE OWNERS,
26

Case No. 3:16-cv-00935-RS
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND
DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO
FILE MOTION FOR
ATTORNEYS’ FEES
Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg

Defendants.

27
28
30376437.1
292717.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:16-cv-00935-RS

1

Plaintiff Timothy Forsyth and Defendants Motion Picture Association of America Inc.,

2 Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures, Paramount Pictures Corporation, Sony Pictures
3 Entertainment Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal City Studios LLC,
4 Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc., and the National Association of Theatre Owners, by and
5 through their undersigned counsel of record, stipulate as follows:
6

A. On November 10, 2016, the Court granted Defendants’ special motion to strike and

7 motion to dismiss with leave to amend.
8

B. Plaintiff does not intend to amend the complaint. Accordingly, Defendants request that

9 the Court enter judgment pursuant to Rule 58.
10

C. The parties further stipulate that, pursuant to Rule 54(d)(2)(B) and Local Rule 54-5(a),

11 Defendants shall have fourteen days from the Court’s entry of judgment to file a motion for
12 attorney’s fees.
13

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

14
15 DATED: November 22, 2016

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID SCHACHMAN, P.C.

16
By:

17

/s/ David Schachman
DAVID SCHACHMAN

18
Attorneys for Plaintiff Timothy Forsyth
19
20 DATED: November 22, 2016

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

21
By:

22

/s/ Kelly M. Klaus
KELLY M. KLAUS

23
Attorneys for Defendants Motion Picture Association of
America, Inc., Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures,
Paramount Pictures Corporation, Sony Pictures
Entertainment Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film
Corporation, Universal City Studios LLC, and Warner
Bros. Entertainment Inc.

24
25
26
27
28
30376437.1
292717.1

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:16-cv-00935-RS

1 DATED: November 22, 2016

BRYAN CAVE LLP

2
By:

3

/s/ K. Lee Marshall
K. LEE MARSHALL

4
Attorneys for Defendant National Association of
Theatre Owners

5
6
7

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all signatories concur with this filing.
By:

8

/s/ K. Lee Marshall

9
THE COURT FINDS GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND ON
10 THAT BASIS THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND IS SO ORDERED.
11
12

DATED: _______________
11/28/16

13
14

HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30376437.1
292717.1

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:16-cv-00935-RS