Marley v. Via International, Inc. et al
Filing
24
ORDER FOR NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 9/12/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2016)
1 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP
Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 90058)
2 Cody R. Kennedy, Esq. (SBN 296061)
3 29229 Canwood StTeet, Suite 208
Agoura Hills, California 91301
4 Telephone:
(818) 991-8080
Facsimile:
(818) 991-8081
5 ssaltzman@marHnsaltzman.com
6 ckennedy@marlinsaltzman.com
7 NARAYANLAW,APC
Santosh Narayan, Esq. (SBN 243273)
8 225 South Lake Avenue, Suite 300
9 Pasadena, California 911 0 1
Telephone:
(626) 432-5435
10 Facsimile:
(626) 657-2921
snarayan@narayanlegal.com
11
12 Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL J. MARLEY
and the Proposed Class
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
CASE NO: 3:16-CV00947-LB
16 MICHAEL J. MARLEY, an individual, on
behalf of himself and all others similarly
17 situated,
Plaintiff,
18
CLASS ACTION
19
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR NOTICE OF
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
V.
VIA INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware
20 Corporation (D/B/A The Digital Concierge);
21 DSI ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEMS, INC., a
California corporation; STEARNS
22 ENTERPRISES, INC., a California
corporation (D/B/A Engineered
23 Environments), and DOES 1-10 inclusive,
24
25
Dei{mdants.
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
1
2
[PROPOSED]ORDER
This action shall be dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff Michael J. Marley pursuant to
3 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(l )(A)(i).
4
As to all plaintiffs similarly situated (e.g. the Plaintiff Class), this action shall be dismissed
5 without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4l(a)(l)(A)(i).
6
Each side to bear its own costs.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 DATED:
10
September 12, 2016
United States Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?