KHN Solutions Inc. v. Vertisense Inc.

Filing 33

ORDER REGARDING APRIL 28, 2016 ORAL ARGUMENT re 30 . Signed by Judge haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/27/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

KHN SOLUTIONS INC.,

Case No. 16-cv-00962-HSG

Plaintiff,
8

ORDER REGARDING APRIL 28, 2016
ORAL ARGUMENT

v.
9
10

VERTISENSE INC.,

Re: Dkt. No. 30

Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14

On April 25, 2016, the parties filed a joint letter informing the Court that the parties have
agreed to have associates argue the pending motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 30.

15

The Court appreciates the parties’ proactive effort to provide opportunities for newer

16

lawyers, and is happy to accommodate the request. The parties should keep in mind that the Court

17

has carefully read and considered the parties’ briefs on the pending motion to dismiss. For this

18

reason, as in all matters, the Court does not expect a presentation (via a slide deck or otherwise)

19

that simply repeats the arguments in the briefs. Instead, counsel should focus the argument on

20

clarifying and augmenting key points. The Court looks forward to Thursday’s hearing.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 27, 2016
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge