KHN Solutions Inc. v. Vertisense Inc.

Filing 72

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 71 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2016)

Download PDF
FULMER WARE LLP PAMELA K. FULMER (SBN 154736) Pam@Fulmerware.com 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 766-3509 Facsimile: (415) 231-5272 VENABLE LLP ALPER T. ERTAS (SBN 264120) ATErtas@Venable.com 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 653-3750 Facsimile: (415) 653-3755 DURIE TANGRI LLP CLEMENT S. ROBERTS (SBN 209203) croberts@durietangri.com TIMOTHY C. SAULSBURY (SBN 281434) tsaulsbury@durietangri.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-362-6666 Facsimile: 415-236-6300 Attorneys for Defendant VERTISENSE INC. ADAM R. HESS (PRO HAC VICE) ARHess@Venable.com 575 Seventh Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: (202) 344-4000 Facsimile: (202) 344-8300 Attorneys for Plaintiff KHN SOLUTIONS, INC. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION KHN Solutions, Inc. CASE NO. 3:16-cv-00962-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE v. Judge: Hon. Haywood Gilliam, Jr. Vertisense Inc. Defendant. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00962-HSG 1 2 3 ORDER 4 The Court, having read and considered the Parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal With 5 6 7 Prejudice and finding good cause, IT IS ORDERED: That any and all of the Parties’ claims and counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice. Each Party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses. 8 9 10 11 Dated: November 15, 2016 __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 3:16-CV-00962-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?