Cornejo v. California Highway Patrol et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time for Defendants County of Alameda, et al., to Respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/27/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 GREGORY B. THOMAS, ESQ. (SBN 239870) ADAM A. VUKOVIC, ESQ. (SBN 301392) 2 SOPHIA V. COHN, ESQ. (SBN 306661) BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE 3 A Professional Corporation 555 12th Street, Suite 1800 4 Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: (510) 834-4350 5 Facsimile: (510) 839-1897 gthomas@bjg.com 6 avukovic@bjg.com scohn@bjg.com 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, sued herein as “ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,” KEVIN BEYRODT, AARON INNS, ANTHONEY FIELDS, IAN STEWART, KAREN 9 EASLING, sued herein as “K. EASLING,” and CAMERON TRACY 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 YOLANDA FRAUSTO individually and as ) successor in interest to the Estate of Decedent ) 15 John Anthony Cornejo, ) , ) 16 ) Plaintiffs, ) 17 ) vs. ) 18 ) CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, ) 19 ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, ) KEVIN BEYRODT, NORMAND D. ) 20 CORNEJO, II, and DOES 1 to 30, inclusive, ) ) 21 Defendants. ) ) 22 And Related Actions ) ) 23 24 Case No.: 16-cv-00974-RS And Related Actions STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ET AL., TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF NORMAN CORNEJO’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO L.R. 6-1(a) Pursuant to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Civil 25 Local rule 6-1(a), the parties in the above-captioned matter hereby stipulate and agree that the 26 deadline for Defendants COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, sued herein as “ALAMEDA COUNTY 27 SHERIFF’S OFFICE,” KEVIN BEYRODT, AARON INNS, ANTHONEY FIELDS, IAN 28 -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF NORMAN CORNEJO’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Norman Cornejo v. County of Alameda, et al. - Case No.: 16-cv-00947-RS; and related actions 1 STEWART, KAREN EASLING, sued herein as “K. EASLING,” and CAMERON TRACY, to 2 respond to Plaintiff NORMAN CORNEJO’S First Amended Complaint in United States District 3 Court for the Northern District of California Case No. 16-cv-00974-RS, shall be until and 4 including Friday, November 18, 2016. 5 Respectfully submitted, 6 DATED: October 27, 2016 BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE A Professional Corporation 7 8 15 By: ___/s/ Gregory B. Thomas GREGORY B. THOMAS, ESQ. ADAM A. VUKOVIC, ESQ. SOPHIA V. COHN, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, sued herein as “ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,” KEVIN BEYRODT, AARON INNS, ANTHONEY FIELDS, IAN STEWART, KAREN EASLING, sued herein as “K. EASLING,” and CAMERON TRACY 16 DATED: October 27, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF NIKOLAUS W. REED 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 By: __/s/ Nikolaus W. Reed_________ NIKOLAUS W. REED, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff NORMAN CORNEJO 18 19 20 DATED: October 27, 2016 QUIRK LAW GROUP, APC 21 22 23 24 By: __/s/ Logan Quirk________________ LOGAN QUIRK, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff NORMAN CORNEJO 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF NORMAN CORNEJO’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Norman Cornejo v. County of Alameda, et al. - Case No.: 16-cv-00947-RS; and related actions 1 ATTESTATION 2 I, Gregory B. Thomas, am counsel for Record for Defendants County of Alameda, et al. I am 3 the registered ECF user whose username and password are being used to file this stipulation. In 4 compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the above-identified counsel concurred in 5 this filing. 6 Dated: October 27, 2016 BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE 7 8 9 10 11 12 By: _/s/ Gregory B. Thomas_______________ GREGORY B. THOMAS Attorney for Defendants COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, sued herein as “ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,” KEVIN BEYRODT, AARON INNS, ANTHONEY FIELDS, IAN STEWART, KAREN EASLING, sued herein as “K. EASLING,” and CAMERON TRACY 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF NORMAN CORNEJO’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Norman Cornejo v. County of Alameda, et al. - Case No.: 16-cv-00947-RS; and related actions 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 DATED: __________, 2016 10/27 3 _________________________________ HON. RICHARD SEEBORG Judge of the United States District Court 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF NORMAN CORNEJO’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Norman Cornejo v. County of Alameda, et al. - Case No.: 16-cv-00947-RS; and related actions

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?