Mageski v. Siempelkamp Nukleartechnik GMBH, et al

Filing 16

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 15 Stipulation to Continue 11 Motion to Remand. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2016)

1
2
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

6
7

ALEXANDER JOHN MAGESKI, JR.

Case No. 3:16-cv-00978-HSG

8

Plaintiff,
9

vs.
10

SIEMPELKAMP NUKLEARTECHNIC
GMBH; SIEMPELKAMP NUCLEAR
TECHNOLOGY, INC.; SIEMPELKAMP
12 NUCLEAR SERVICES, INC.;
SIEMPELKAMP LIMITED
13 PARTNERSHIP; and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
MOTION BY PLAINTIFF
ALEXANDER JOHN MAGESKI, JR.
FOR REMAND OF CASE TO CONTRA
COSTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

11

14

Defendants.
15
16
17

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that

18

the hearing for Plaintiff Alexander John Mageski, Jr.’s Motion for Remand of Case to

19

Contra Costa County Superior Court be continued from May 5, 2016 to June 9, 2016 at
_____________,

20

2:00 p.m. ________________________________.
2016 at The case management conference previously scheduled for June 7, 2016 is continued to
June 9, 2016 at 2:00 p.m., to be heard along with the motion to remand.

21
22
23
24
25
26

Dated: _______________, 2016
April 28
By:__________________________________
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Court Judge

27
28
30
31

Case No. 3:16-cv-00978-HSG
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION BY PLAINTIFF ALEXANDER JOHN MAGESKI, JR.
FOR REMAND OF CASE TO CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT