Malibu Media, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 50.184.78.98

Filing 30

ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND RETAINING JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE TERMS OF SETTLEMENT AS MODIFIED by Hon. William Alsup granting 29 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2017)

Download PDF
1 Henrik Mosesi, Esq. (SBN: 189672) Law Offices of Henrik Mosesi 2 433 N. Camden Dr., 6th Floor Beverly Hills, CA 90210 3 Tel.: 310-734-4269 Fax: 310-734-4053 4 henry@mosesi.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 Jonathan Black, SBN 275017 6 Ian Bennett-Goldberg, SBN 271746 Weston Law Group, PC 7 2001 Omega Rd. Ste. 203 8 San Ramon, CA 94583 (925) 362-3120 9 Attorneys for Defendant 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 San Francisco 14 MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, Case Number: 3:16-cv-00999-WHA 15 Plaintiff, 16 vs. 17 JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 18 50.184.78.98, 19 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL RETAINING JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE TERMS OF SETTLEMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER As modified Defendant. 20 21 22 Plaintiff Malibu Media, LLC and Defendant John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 50.184.78.98, by their undersigned counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules 23 24 25 26 of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate that all claims asserted against each other in this matter are hereby dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff and Defendant John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 50.184.78.98 settled this 27 matter on or about February 21, 2017; 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case Number: 3:16-cv-00999-WHA 1 The settlement agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant call for payment of settlement 2 funds on or before April 3, 2017; 3 Plaintiff and Defendant John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 50.184.78.98 4 respectfully request that this Court enter an order dismissing without prejudice all Plaintiff’s and 5 6 Defendant John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 50.184.78.98’s claims and counter-claims against each other, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs; 7 8 Plaintiff and Defendant further request that this Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the 9 terms of the settlement; 10 Unless enforcement proceedings are pending, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate that this 11 case can be dismissed with prejudice on or after April 7, 2017; 12 13 Consistent herewith Plaintiff and Defendant consent to the Court having its case closed for administrative purposes. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Henrik Mosesi Henrik Mosesi, Esq. Law Offices of Henrik Mosesi 433 N. Camden Dr., 6th Floor Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Tel: (310) 734-4269 Email: henry@mosesi.com Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Jonathan Black Jonathan Black, Esq. Ian Bennett-Goldberg, SBN 271746 Weston Law Group, PC 2001 Omega Rd. Ste. 203 San Ramon, CA 94583 (925) 362-3120 21 22 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 23 I hereby certify that on March 2, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing document with 24 the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF and that service was perfected on all counsel of record and interested parties through this system. 25 26 27 By: /s/ Henrik Mosesi Henrik Mosesi 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case Number: 3:16-cv-00999-WHA 1 The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing 2 therefor, orders the following: 3 4 5 6 1. The complaint and counter-claim is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); 2. Each party to bear their own costs and attorney’s fees; 3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of the 7 8 9 settlement agreement; for six months. 4. Unless proceedings to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement are 10 pending, this case will be treated for all purposes as dismissed with prejudice 11 after April 7, 2017, without further order of court. 12 13 Date: March 7, 2017. __________________________ 14 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case Number: 3:16-cv-00999-WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?