Malibu Media, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 50.184.78.98
Filing
30
ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND RETAINING JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE TERMS OF SETTLEMENT AS MODIFIED by Hon. William Alsup granting 29 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2017)
1 Henrik Mosesi, Esq. (SBN: 189672)
Law Offices of Henrik Mosesi
2 433 N. Camden Dr., 6th Floor
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
3 Tel.: 310-734-4269
Fax: 310-734-4053
4 henry@mosesi.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5
Jonathan Black, SBN 275017
6 Ian Bennett-Goldberg, SBN 271746
Weston Law Group, PC
7
2001 Omega Rd. Ste. 203
8 San Ramon, CA 94583
(925) 362-3120
9 Attorneys for Defendant
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
San Francisco
14
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,
Case Number: 3:16-cv-00999-WHA
15
Plaintiff,
16
vs.
17
JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address
18 50.184.78.98,
19
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
RETAINING JURISDICTION TO
ENFORCE TERMS OF SETTLEMENT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
As modified
Defendant.
20
21
22
Plaintiff Malibu Media, LLC and Defendant John Doe subscriber assigned IP address
50.184.78.98, by their undersigned counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules
23
24
25
26
of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate that all claims asserted against each other in this matter are
hereby dismissed without prejudice.
Plaintiff and Defendant John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 50.184.78.98 settled this
27 matter on or about February 21, 2017;
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Case Number: 3:16-cv-00999-WHA
1
The settlement agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant call for payment of settlement
2 funds on or before April 3, 2017;
3
Plaintiff and Defendant John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 50.184.78.98
4 respectfully request that this Court enter an order dismissing without prejudice all Plaintiff’s and
5
6
Defendant John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 50.184.78.98’s claims and counter-claims
against each other, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs;
7
8
Plaintiff and Defendant further request that this Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the
9 terms of the settlement;
10
Unless enforcement proceedings are pending, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate that this
11 case can be dismissed with prejudice on or after April 7, 2017;
12
13
Consistent herewith Plaintiff and Defendant consent to the Court having its case closed
for administrative purposes.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Henrik Mosesi
Henrik Mosesi, Esq.
Law Offices of Henrik Mosesi
433 N. Camden Dr., 6th Floor
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Tel: (310) 734-4269
Email: henry@mosesi.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Jonathan Black
Jonathan Black, Esq.
Ian Bennett-Goldberg, SBN 271746
Weston Law Group, PC
2001 Omega Rd. Ste. 203
San Ramon, CA 94583
(925) 362-3120
21
22
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
23
I hereby certify that on March 2, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing document with
24 the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF and that service was perfected on all counsel of record and
interested parties through this system.
25
26
27
By: /s/ Henrik Mosesi
Henrik Mosesi
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Case Number: 3:16-cv-00999-WHA
1
The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
2 therefor, orders the following:
3
4
5
6
1. The complaint and counter-claim is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to
FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii);
2. Each party to bear their own costs and attorney’s fees;
3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of the
7
8
9
settlement agreement; for six months.
4. Unless proceedings to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement are
10
pending, this case will be treated for all purposes as dismissed with prejudice
11
after April 7, 2017, without further order of court.
12
13
Date: March 7, 2017.
__________________________
14
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Case Number: 3:16-cv-00999-WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?