Sai v. Smith et al
Filing
22
ORDER RE: EX PARTE STATUS UPDATE AND MOTION FOR STAY/TOLLING re 21 Ex Parte MOTION to Stay all deadlinesEx Parte MOTION to Continue case management conferenceEx Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File complaint and IFP motion filed by Sai. Amended Pleadings and IFP Application due by 7/31/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/17/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 28, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SAI,
Case No. 16-cv-01024-JST
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
DAVID SMITH, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER RE: EX PARTE STATUS
UPDATE AND MOTION FOR
STAY/TOLLING
Re: ECF No. 21
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Plaintiff has filed an Ex Parte Status Update and Motion for Stay/Tolling requesting
12
13
several forms of relief. ECF No. 21. The Court has considered Plaintiff’s filing in full and all of
14
his requests. The Court further notes that the 90 days allotted for service of a complaint pursuant
15
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) have elapsed. Therefore, the Court hereby orders as follows:
(1) In light of Plaintiff’s anticipated filing of an amended complaint, the Court finds good
16
17
cause under Rule 4(m) to extend the time period for service, as outlined below.
(2) Plaintiff shall have until July 31, 2016, to file a complete IFP application and an
18
19
amended complaint.
(3) If an IFP application and amended complaint are not filed by July 31, 2016, the Court
20
21
shall issue an Order to Show Cause as to why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule
22
4(m).
23
24
25
26
27
28
(4) The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for June 29, 2016 is continued
to August 17, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 28, 2016
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?