Evans et al v. Arizona Cardinals Football Club, LLC et al
ORDER DENYING 159 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2017)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ETOPIA EVANS, et al.,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 16-01030 WHA
ORDER DENYING PRO
HAC VICE APPLICATION
ARIZONA CARDINALS FOOTBALL
CLUB, LLC, et al.,
The pro hac vice application of Attorney Marla Axelrod (Dkt. No. 159) is DENIED for
failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. That rule requires an applicant to certify that “he or
she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest
court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added).
Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it identifies only the
state of bar membership — e.g., “the bar of District of Columbia” — is inadequate under the
rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be
paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 19, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?