Evans et al v. Arizona Cardinals Football Club, LLC et al

Filing 64

ORDER by Judge Alsup denying 57 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; denying 58 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 EVANS ET AL, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 No. C 16-01030 WHA Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION 14 ARIZONA CARDINALS FOOTBALL CLUB LLC ET AL, 15 Defendant. / 16 17 The pro hac vice applications of Steven Silverman and Phillip James Closius are 18 DENIED for failing to comply with Civil Local Rule 11–3. The local rule requires that an 19 applicant certify that “he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United 20 States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such 21 bar” (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such 22 that it only identifies the state of bar membership — such as “the bar of Texas” — is inadequate 23 under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court (such as the Supreme Court of 24 Texas). While the application fees do not need to be paid again, the applications cannot be 25 processed until corrected forms are submitted. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: May 24, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?