Evans et al v. Arizona Cardinals Football Club, LLC et al
Order by Hon. William Alsup denying 62 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2016)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EVANS ET AL,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 16-01030 WHA
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC
ARIZONA CARDINALS FOOTBALL
CLUB LLC ET AL,
The pro hac vice application of Alexander Williams is DENIED for failing to comply
with Civil Local Rule 11–3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he or she is
an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of
another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). Filling out
the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar
membership — such as “the bar of Texas” — is inadequate under the local rule because it fails
to identify a specific court (such as the Supreme Court of Texas). While the application fees do
not need to be paid again, the applications cannot be processed until corrected forms are
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 24, 2016.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?