Evans et al v. Arizona Cardinals Football Club, LLC et al

Filing 67

Order by Hon. William Alsup denying 62 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 EVANS ET AL, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 No. C 16-01030 WHA Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION 14 ARIZONA CARDINALS FOOTBALL CLUB LLC ET AL, 15 Defendant. / 16 17 The pro hac vice application of Alexander Williams is DENIED for failing to comply 18 with Civil Local Rule 11–3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he or she is 19 an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of 20 another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). Filling out 21 the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar 22 membership — such as “the bar of Texas” — is inadequate under the local rule because it fails 23 to identify a specific court (such as the Supreme Court of Texas). While the application fees do 24 not need to be paid again, the applications cannot be processed until corrected forms are 25 submitted. 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 Dated: May 24, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?