Yates v. West Contra Costa Unified School District

Filing 121

Discovery Order re Deposition of R. Bell. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 7/5/2017. (mejlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/5/2017: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (rmm2S, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FERNANDO YATES, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 11 v. Case No. 16-cv-01077-MEJ ORDER RE: JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF Re: Dkt. No. 119 WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. 12 13 Defendant has shown good cause for deposing Rhem Bell after the close of discovery. See 14 Jt. Ltr. Br., Dkt. No. 119. Plaintiff does not raise any objections, and does not argue (much less 15 show) he will be prejudiced if Defendant is allowed to depose the witness. See id. Before 16 scheduling Mr. Bell’s deposition, Defendant and Plaintiff shall confer and confirm that Plaintiff 17 intends to attend the deposition. If Plaintiff so confirms, Defendant shall schedule the deposition 18 for a time during which Plaintiff can attend (after 1:30 p.m. on Monday-Friday). If, after 19 confirming his intention to attend the deposition, Plaintiff does not do so, Defendant shall notify 20 the Court and the Court may order Plaintiff to reimburse Defendant for any time its counsel spent 21 scheduling the deposition at Plaintiff’s convenience or waiting for Plaintiff to appear. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 5, 2017 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?